Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 24

< February 23	February 25 >

February 24

Wheelock 7002T and Wild Cherry Pepsi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by User:Peripitus. — Aitias // discussion 02:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wheelock 7002T and Wild Cherry Pepsi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lahs08 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, and kind of unencyclopedic with all the junk food sharing the table with the alarm. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Uneeded and awkward picture; an image of it installed would be better instead of a size comparison with a can of soda. Nate • (chatter) 04:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Charles Darwin2sm.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles Darwin2sm.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Greeneto (notify | contribs).

Redundant smaller, low-quality version of . ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also I'd like to apologize to the people who's pages got tagged, the Userbox image was replaced before I put this image up for FfD, but I guess it was too soon for Twinkle. Twinkle needs some time to move on. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Yellow1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by User:Peripitus. — Aitias // discussion 02:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yellow1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dkroll2 (notify | contribs).

No source given. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 05:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cover-Banan-Abhidhan.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jclemens (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cover-Banan-Abhidhan.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Srikantorahman (notify | contribs).

This is a Cover page of Bangla Akademi Spelling Dictionary and it copyrighted to Paschimbanga Bangla Akademi, West Bengal -Thanks. Jayanta Nath^{(Talk|Contrb)} 08:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Nilanjana2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by User:Peripitus. — Aitias // discussion 02:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nilanjana2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Filmwallah2905 (notify | contribs).

No description for Non-free use media and no source -Thanks. Jayanta Nath^{(Talk|Contrb)} 14:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "fair use" now states that this is not a screenshot but is "released in the free Press kit as publicity material by the production company Arjoe Entertainment during the release of the film" - thus the license is now incorrect and "fair use" invalid. Skier Dude (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Oakland1977.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oakland1977.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Edelmand (notify | contribs).

Non-free poster used in three articles, none of which contain any commentary on the poster, thus failing WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 18:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Commentary in Led Zeppelin North American Tour 1977 states that the poster was used to promote Led Zeppelin's twin concerts at Oakland, July 1977.
Delete - I cannot see any significant commentary and certainly none of the image on the poster - fails WP:NFCC#8 as a simply decorative use - Peripitus (Talk) 02:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

JimmyBuffettTicketStub1995.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep PhilKnight (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JimmyBuffettTicketStub1995.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AjaxSmack (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, just an image of a concert ticket, adds nothing to the article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The stub shows the significance of his band in that it has full (equal) billing at live events, something not true with Buffett's recorded output. — AjaxSmack 22:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If it was fair use I would probably be against it, but there's no harm using free images for illustration. Stifle (talk) 09:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Is a scan of something that was made by someone else for commercial use considered free? ~ JohnnyMrNinja 09:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, if it has "no (or no significant) creative content." Hence the PD-ineligible template. See WP:PD#Non-creative works. — AjaxSmack 02:00, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Right. Just like blank forms, this doesn't pass the threshold of originality necessary to attract a copyright. Stifle (talk) 14:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It adds a great deal to the article. Andrewa (talk) 20:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Taylorrichards.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by User:Peripitus. — Aitias // discussion 02:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taylorrichards.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stan_weller (notify | contribs).

Used in two different articles with no commentary whatsoever on the image, thus failing WP:NFCC #8. howcheng {chat} 19:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

TCOIL4.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by User:Peripitus. — Aitias // discussion 02:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TCOIL4.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by K7jeb (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, intended for Tesla coil, which now has File:Tesla coil 3.svg. JaGa^talk 19:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Zombies dinner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by User:Peripitus. — Aitias // discussion 02:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zombies dinner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Peace keeper II (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGa^talk 19:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

LedZep1979.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Delete - it must be shown how the image significantly increases reader's understanding and, per Stifle, the source and copyright holder must be identified - Peripitus (Talk) 20:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LedZep1979.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Edelmand (notify | contribs).

Non-free screenshot used without any commentary on the scene being depicted. howcheng {chat} 23:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The commentary for the scene reads "Led Zeppelin performing live at the Knebworth Festival in 1979, as shown in the Led Zeppelin DVD". Why is this considered insufficient? Edelmand (talk) 11:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but because the image fails WP:NFCC#10a rather than any other reason. Stifle (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Knebworth79.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. The image fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. Stifle (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knebworth79.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Edelmand (notify | contribs).

Unnecessary non-free image of people that does not increase reader understanding in any way. howcheng {chat} 23:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The page Knebworth Festival 1979 specifically mentions the band completing a publicity photograph shoot prior to the festival. This is one of the photographs taken at the shoot. It therefore does increase reader's understanding of the event. Edelmand (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Zeppelin68.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by User:Peripitus. — Aitias // discussion 02:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zeppelin68.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Edelmand (notify | contribs).

Already one non-free image of the band available in the article from the same time period, so no need for a second. howcheng {chat} 23:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.