Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upstairs at The Gatehouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) _David ^WS _(contribs) 21:55, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upstairs at The Gatehouse

This article is pretty much unrefenced, POV advertising. The only thing remotely notable about it is that it is old, and age alone does not establish notablility. Also, it is very unencyclopedic. Jonathan321 (talk) 00:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Weak keep ~~seems to be just an ad for a nn theatre~~ no real sources found on the theatre itself and no evidence of truly notable productions at it, but the last ref. mentions in passing "apparently Keats, Shelley and Byron were regular visitors to the Gatehouse during the four years of their acquaintanceship" which confers some level of notability. JJL (talk) 03:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ The theater is definitely a very common venue for staging various plays but I could not find any sources with theater itself as subject matter or articles that detail on its history. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 03:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in light of improvements made by Ecoleetage. The article is now more of encyclopedic nature and provides significant sourced information. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 10:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep due to the many sources found here. Unfortunately, a large number of sources on the theater have to be paid for (this), while pretty much all of the others talk about plays the theater has held and not about it itself. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 07:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep I have rewritten the article (which was, admittedly, problematic), and all of the spam was boiled away. We now have an efficient stub that more than meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. Furthermore, the assertions this is an obscure theatre are groundless -- the productions hosted at this venue are able to attract review attention from London's major media outlets, so it is clearly well-known within the city's theatre circles. As part of the London fringe theatre environment, this venue is highly notable. Ecoleetage (talk) 10:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to rescue efforts by Ecoleetage. Well done, again! :) Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 14:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Snowiest of Keeps per the buildings 750+ year history. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:42, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.