Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uju Kennedy-Ohanenye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Passes NPOL as Minister in national cabinet. (non-admin closure) 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 06:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uju Kennedy-Ohanenye

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person is not notable (per politics or general notability), and the page is too promotional and flattering. Lulakayd (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, Women, Law, and Nigeria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The person is a Minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the only female presidential aspirant of the ruling party in the 2023 election.

On the view that the article is flattery and promotional, can you outline words or statements that I need to remove? Deborahudo (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: A minister of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is inherently notable. Princess of Ara 10:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep — a member of the Cabinet of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. May be promotional but AfD is not for cleanups. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:NPOL as a cabinet minister and has likely has enough coverage for an outright GNG pass; deletion is not cleanup. Curbon7 (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passes WP:POLITICIAN. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Clearly passes WP:NPOL (WP:NSUBPOL). Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.