Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trident Media Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trident Media Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPANY, with no independent media notice. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:19, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Concur with nom. Such spam should got to speedy first, prod second, here last though. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A company does not inherit notability by intermediating for prominent writers or their estates. Such coverage that I could find confirms this to be a company going about its business but I am not seeing evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 08:25, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.