Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scarlet Singapore

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:45, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Scarlet Singapore

edit
The Scarlet Singapore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Per WP:CORPDEPTH, inclusion in the Conde Nast list is not sufficient to establish notability. Most coverage of this term refers to an unrelated business in the UK. Coverage of the business in this article is not significant and is limited to passing mentions and press releases. Ibadibam (talk) 23:15, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just come across this when browsing articles for deletion and I was initially in agreement to delete it.. but then I got sentimental and now want to rescue it! I hope I can save it in the next couple of hours.. wish me luck! ツStacey (talk) 22:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did I do it? Did I do it? Is it now saved?! ツStacey (talk) 23:11, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:37, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 10:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 10:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 10:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Tropical Hotels: Thailand Malaysia Singapore Java Bali. Tuttle Publishing. pp. pt-230-237 (and more, scroll down) (subscription required)
  2. ^ "The Scarlet: Singapore Boutique Hotel Review". Yahoo! News (Singapore). (Be sure to select READ MORE in the article)
  3. ^ Boutique Hotel Offers Different Kind of Stay". New Straits Times
  4. ^ I Love it Here: South-East Asia "The Scarlet Singapore is replete with five-star international chain hotels, but good boutique accommodation is rare. Only in the past few years has that niche opened up on the island, which is odd for a city that promotes itself as a modern, ..." (subscription required)
  5. ^ "Singapore hotels go abroad". The Straits Times. (Amounts to two short paragraphs)
  • Keep. Seems clear that there are sufficient references for notability , There often are for luxury hotels. (Some such articles are basically advertising, but this seems to be descriptive.) DGG ( talk ) 05:06, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Scarlet_Singapore&oldid=1078017075"