Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penny Gordon Woods
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Good_Times. The history is intact should any editor be interested in performing a merge, or creating of list of characters from the program. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 14:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Penny Gordon Woods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 15:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to parent article (the show), without the unsourced plot details, there's not enough left to sustain an article. - Mgm|(talk) 21:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as for the other characters to an article for them all. Individual ones in such a list need not be Notable--there is no such requirement for indiviual items of article content. No reason given applies as an objection to this--suitable descriptive content can come from the fiction itself. As for keeping a separate article, at this point it does not really make sense until there are some kind of sources. Lets work towards a compromise on these. DGG (talk) 18:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kurykh 22:56, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- RayAYang (talk) 23:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 20:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Belongs in parent article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:24, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.