Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Plain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Plain

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article in question focuses on the founder of a relatively unknown company. It was authored by a blocked user, and only two out of the five sources used are considered unreliable. Unfortunately, the article lacks the required in-depth coverage from reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, as outlined in the General Notability Guideline Akshithmanya ^talk 15:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: United States of America and California. Akshithmanya ^talk 15:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Women. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. non-notable, orphan, created by blocked ed, etc. 128.252.210.3 (talk) 18:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Was once prodded and then de-prodded due to malformed, which may or may not make it eligible for soft deletion; relisting just to be safe.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The NZ Herald is the only reliable source there is. Rest I find are tabloids, so nothing for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 22:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.