Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Airport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 20:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Little Airport

Same/similar concerns as 22 Cats as also expressed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/22 Cats. Notability in doubt in regard to music criteria. — Realist² 15:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With support from Chet Lam to actually hold 2 concerts in Hong Kong Arts Centre, at least it is some non-trivial coverage.

p.s. can this link from Apple Daily help out a bit? --58.152.233.62 (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The link is dead, btw. TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - top ten on the hong kong single charts is a sufficient claim to notability --T-rex 16:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, sorry, the link was dead, thus the reliability of the source itself was hard to attain. I've replaced it with a fact tag. — Realist² 19:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Not enough there I'm afraid. One web review. A self published album. It's pretty thin. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm neutral. This exists and has some coverage. Doesn't seem to hurt to include it. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:49, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only claims aren't backed by sources. Hong Kong doesn't have an official chart it seems. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 04:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 07:01, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I think the Allmusic entry and the Time Out review should be enough to demonstrate substantial independent coverage. I also found a substantial review of their second album on Xinhuanet [1] Juzhong (talk) 13:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.