Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muaiad Admawi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muaiad Admawi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost a decade ago, this man played 74 mins of professional sport. The sources are database websites only and the article is just a prose version of his Soccerway entry. Slstat is preserved here and clearly has no WP:GNG coverage. He has a cup game listed on his Soccerway page but this occurred when Al Wehda FC were not playing in the 2013–14 Saudi Professional League following their relegation in the 2012–13 Saudi Professional League, therefore it doesn't confer notability.

Searching "مؤيد أدماوي" yields a couple of passing mentions in Sport KSA and a match day squad listing in Makkah News. None of this complies with GNG either. Clear consensus from well over 100 recent AfDs that footballers who trivially meet WP:NFOOTBALL but fail GNG should be deleted. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 12:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails the spirit of NFOOTBALL and GNG. Geschichte (talk) 10:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Subject lacks the required WP:SIGCOV. As consensus is stated at WP:WINNEROUTCOMES, this should result in deletion if no one is able to find sourcing which would qualify the subject for WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 13:42, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.