Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Liot Hill (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Karen Liot Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't believe that the article passes WP:NPOL. There is not much significant coverage on the subject and she has not held high enough office to warrant an article. GoldMiner24 Talk 02:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- hi! I rewrote this article because Liot Hill is running for Executive Council of New Hampshire, along with Mike Liberty, another page I created at the same time. The NH executive council is a big deal here as it acts as a check on the state's governor, as featured in this recent Boston Globe article. Both are serious candidates in upcoming 2024 New Hampshire Executive Council election. I do understand that at this point they are only candidates. H0n0r (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Being a candidate for office does not make you notable. I would advise the editor who created this page to read WP:NPOL: "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability" BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 05:16, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, Women, Radio, France, New Hampshire, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Previously deleted, not there on GNG grounds, and candidates for office are not inherently notable as their notability is not lasting. SportingFlyer T·C 02:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.