- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NativeForeigner Talk 09:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jerome Ersland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject of this article is non-notable and was brought briefly into the media spotlight nearly four years ago for shooting an unarmed robber. Apart from this single event, the subject has no other reason to be on Wikipedia and fails the Notability requirement. The article itself has mostly been written by a single user and contains heavy POV issues and Original Research pertaining to the causes and motivations of the crime. Recommend Deletion. OberRanks (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not noteworthy enough. Kierzek (talk) 17:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, widely cited in firearm/carry permit training. Jakiah (talk) 21:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 22:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.