Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Benjamin Roberts
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as A7, also recreation of article deleted previously as A7 and per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Benjamin Roberts. ... discospinster talk 02:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Jacob Benjamin Roberts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
no independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability. RJaguar3 | u | t 00:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. Appears to be largely promotional. JNW (talk) 00:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per WP:A7. What WP:VANITY. If this does not fail by A7, it certainly will by SPAM. Tagged. DARTH PANDAduel 02:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.