Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iodosilane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Iodosilane

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod (proposed deletion). This page does not indicate its notability. Also iodosilane is not significant enough. Mast303 (talk) 23:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 00:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's covered in three peer-reviewed journals, one explaining the microwave spectra of the compound. That's about as detailed as you could want for a compound. Oaktree b (talk) 01:33, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
and dozens of citations and articles in Gscholar about the compound and various reactions it undergoes, dating back to at least 1984. Oaktree b (talk) 01:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close No way this is going to be deleted. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI about the nominator being a sock (which is pretty obvious) and being disruptive. This silly nomination does not look good in this respect. --Cavarrone 16:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw this deletion nomination. Mast303 (talk) 18:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.