- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) -- Lord Roem (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- In a Fix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-Notable program. Google and Yahoo search no disternable results. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The mere assertion it is not notable is not all that persuasive. The article cites reliable sources, indicating its notability. As an older program, not all reliable sources will be available online. In any event, it was notable in its time, and notability is not temporary. As for the lack of Google results, merely typing "in a fix", a very common phrase, is unlikely to produce "disternable" results. However, if you put the words in quotation marks and add "TLC", you will see that there are many hits specific to the program. Agent 86 (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Coverage exists although it is behind paywalls. Although the article details are not available, the article titles certainly do indicate that the show "In a Fix" is the primary subject. See: [1], [2], and [3] as examples. -- Whpq (talk) 19:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.