Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idiots in the Machine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Idiots in the Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Same as Battle For Forever, except this one was created back in the day when Wikipedia was lax in its inclusion criteria, to put it mildly. Fails WP:NBOOK: no significant reviews, and no coverage of note. PK650 (talk) 20:15, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle For Forever and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Savio. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:17, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I don't really see any sources on this topic.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.