Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EcoJet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. closing early as nominator has been blocked as a sock and we have a clear consensus of permitted editors Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EcoJet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The "EcoJet" was essentially a publicity stunt by easyJet. There has been no further coverage of anything related to this "project" since then. What is in the article is essentially original research. ProudSaffa (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 16:27, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Looks more like a request by an airline for someone else to design and build an aircraft and no one has taken it up. Not really notable, even if proper refs could be found. - Ahunt (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Merge - Merge sourced details to easyJet article to flesh out the short paragraph.there. - BilCat (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- By "Delete/Merge" I meant I'm fine with outright deletion in lieu of merging. - BilCat (talk) 15:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to easyJet, notable (in a sense) in that the company proposed it but nowhere near Wikinotable enough for an article. (Note that merges preclude deletion, requiring redirect). - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:37, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it is not a real jet. Spumuq (talk) 15:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Merge to easyJet. Not enough reliable sources to warrant its own article.
Merge/Delete to easyJet, this looks to have been wild postulation to push manufacturers to develop more efficient aircraft - more of a tactic than a sound plan. Kyteto (talk) 15:44, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.