Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwarves Deep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Forgotten Realms modules and sourcebooks#Sourcebooks. czar 05:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarves Deep

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no meaning, and cites one fan souce. It easily fails WP:GAMEGUIDE, and should be deleted. I-82-I | TALK 04:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While this nomination is weak (what does it mean "no meaning") the article has no references, just one external link, and as written, fails GNG/NBOOK. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Forgotten Realms modules and sourcebooks#Sourcebooks per WP:ATD. BOZ (talk) 12:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Forgotten Realms modules and sourcebooks#Sourcebooks. As this one has no sources, there is nothing to actually merge. Rorshacma (talk) 15:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Forgotten Realms modules and sourcebooks#Sourcebooks. I have added a couple of sources to confirm accuracy of material. Guinness323 (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Forgotten Realms modules and sourcebooks#Sourcebooks. I don't see how any of the points of WP:GAMEGUIDE applies here. And in what definition does this article have "no meaning"? There is some sourced content here now, and the target article would benefit from a sentence of description of what this module is about, so I am convinced there is something to merge rather than redirect only. Daranios (talk) 10:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.