Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Ryan Hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Ryan Hall

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find anything to suggest Hall passes WP:NFOOTBALL, WP:NMUSICIAN or WP:GNG. Full source analysis will follow. I found Tudo Pelo Futebol in a WP:BEFORE search but, with no games listed there, it doesn't establish notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment - clear GNG fail Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

**Source assessment table:**
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
http://bleachersbrew.blogspot.com/2011/02/cast-nearly-complete-for-azkals.html		Blogspot sites are almost never reliable	Mentioned once	✘ No
https://www.djryanhall.com/about	His own website		Anyone can make a website these days	✘ No
https://www.instagram.com/p/CXBrjdOs7x5/		Social media		✘ No
https://auranight.club/events-and-vip/			Not mentioned	✘ No
https://auranight.club/events-and-vip/			As above	✘ No
https://www.facebook.com/BacchusBishopsStortford/photos/2445185438958642		Facebook ad		✘ No
https://www.instagram.com/p/CUZm1EosuQM/		Instagram ad		✘ No
https://www.instagram.com/p/CV_NeiGLMz7/		Instagram ad		✘ No
https://www.instagram.com/p/CWbZqRkMwss/		Instagram ad		✘ No
https://www.instagram.com/p/CWq_JgULMef/		Instagram ad		✘ No
https://www.transfermarkt.com/ryan-hall/profil/spieler/207665		See WP:TRANSFERMARKT, unreliable	Stats	✘ No
https://www.pep.ph/lifestyle/celebrations/145607/phil-younghusband-wedding-a721-20190827-lfrm			3 passing mentions	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As clearly mentioned in source assessment table by nominator. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NMUSICIAN. DMySon (talk) 18:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This feels like WP:PROMO. I could not find any WP:SIGCOV to indicate the subject qualifies for a standalone article. GauchoDude (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I would fully concur with the points raised by the nominator and other editors above. The subject does not have the level of coverage or notability that would be needed for them to have an article. Dunarc (talk) 23:57, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFOOTY per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.