Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coral Amiga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coral Amiga

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is borderline but I think this one falls on non-notable. Her most notable role is likely the recurring one in Rome but past that WP:SIGCOV seems extremely limited. I found an interview in Selig Film News but nothing more significant. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 11:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and England. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 11:34, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Noting that sources have been added to the article but that I do not believe they rise to WP:SIGCOV of Amiga herself. Of the sources, one is a database entry, one is the interview linked above, and the others only give her single-sentence (or less) mentions about projects she's worked. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 21:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with the nominator how this may considered borderline, especially with zero references at the time. I have added 12 citations since nomination - some of which are sigcov, or sigcov reviews, of works she played a major part creating. Both WP:NACTOR and WP:FILMMAKER apply: as an actor, Amiga has had significant roles in definitely notable productions (Rome, Southcliffe), and as a screenwriter and director of short films her work has attracted several sigcov secondary reviews. There has been some attention from notable film festivals too, however I am still working to ascertain the full list of what awards she has either won or been nominated for (TorinoFilmLab has a bio with further detail on her filmmaking career [1]). Taken altogether and in the spirit of WP:BASIC, that multiple sources may be combined, I lean towards the presumption of notability. ResonantDis_tortion 19:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 01:42, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Slight keep~~ Delete, Depending on how strict you want to be with sources that contribute to notability, it could flip. I would say that it does pass with FNs 1, 11, and maybe 2 and 9 (with others possibly contributing). Though if any of these were decided to not contribute to notability, I will switch my !vote. ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 02:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My analysis is that 1 is a bio at an event Amiga was involved in - Probably WP:PRIMARY and only a paragraph, so not WP:SIGCOV. 11 is a database entry with no actual coverage, it's just a list of three things she's been involved with - Again, not SIGCOV. 2 doesn't even mention Amiga's name, just a show she played a character in. 9 is decent but an interview, so it's also PRIMARY. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 02:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed my vote to delete. ✶Mitch 199811 ✶ 11:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I largely agree with ResonantDistortion's assessment here, and will further note that the guideline raised, also known as WP:CREATIVE doesn't require the contributions to be in a single form. Acting, writing, directing, all-in-one, etc go towards the SNG. Evaluating the collective body of work, anchored by Rome, I think the SNG is met and presumption of notability is there. —siro χ o 08:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.