Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Spears

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 17:40, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Spears

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Only coverage is routine announcements of hiring, primarily in connected sources Slywriter (talk) 16:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Slywriter (talk) 16:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with nom, only routine stuff about him getting the job. This is nothing more than a beefed up linkedin. He doesn't even appear to have a spectacular win record for instance, that would help notability. This is just "guy having/doing job". Oaktree b (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I improved the article by replacing connected sources with independent sources. Added non-routine sources as well as a notable accomplishment during tenure. Eknight2012 (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All that's been added is more re-published press releases. Nothing that indicates notability. Slywriter (talk) 22:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Enough significant coverage from sources unaffiliated with the universities he worked at to make this a close GNG pass Frank Anchor 02:09, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.