Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 23

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cage Rage 23

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article contents fail WP:SPORTSEVENT in that they lack well-sourced prose discussing the event and do not assert the event's notability. The events also appear to fail WP:GNG as coverage of the events are WP:ROUTINE fight announcements and results. TreyGeek (talk) 16:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. TreyGeek (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All Nothing to show any of these events meet WP:SPORTSEVENT. These are just fight cards for a second tier MMA organization. Championship fights for second tier organizations do not show notability and these articles and their sources are just routine sports reporting. Jakejr (talk) 02:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All - Non-top tier organization fight card results without enough sourcing to pass WP:GNG. Luchuslu (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, fail WP:GNG and WP:SPORTSEVENT. LlamaAl (talk) 21:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.