Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Cooley (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to CNET. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Cooley

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person has not come closer to passing WP:JOURNALIST since the page was first nominated for deletion in 2006. Despite being a high-level editor at CNET, sources about (not by) this person are scarce. If there is no consensus to delete, possibly redirect to CNET or Buzz Out Loud. KidAd • SPEAK 18:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Justi yaya 18:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Justi yaya 18:58, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 12:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is a tough one. There's an article by another Cnet person about his 1988 Ford station wagon and literally hundreds of hits on articles he's written over the years. Based on the volume of work he's done, I think he might just be notable, or at least earn a sub-seciton in the main CNet article. He's given interviews for NPR as a tech expert, so he's somewhat well known in the media landscape.Oaktree b (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to CNET. Coverage of the individual himself is limited to minimal author bios on various works he has produced. No indication in teh article or in searches that passes the GNG or any applicable SNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 14:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.