- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 13:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Based music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Alleged music genre "claimed to be" created by vaguely notable band with practically nothing but primary sources. Black Kite 13:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 16:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable or verifiable, a neologism at best. Made up genres are usually deleted. --neon white talk 17:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Is there a Fill-in-the-wikipedian's-name-here Law concerning new musical genres or subgenres? It seems to be similar in predictability to Ten Pound Hammer's and Geogre's Law. AlexTiefling (talk) 21:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: A made up genre. Schuym1 (talk) 21:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.