Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baek Su Rin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Baik Sou-linne. Great catch, User:59.149.124.29 and User:24.151.10.165. A Train^talk 07:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baek Su Rin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer which fails WP:AUTHOR. Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 10:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 11:42, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 11:42, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:44, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Za wl 13:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a duplicate or fork of Baik Sou-linne (Korean: 백수린). I do not know which is the better transliteration in English nor can I tell if Korean sources demonstrate notability. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 16:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Baik Sou-linne as {{R from other spelling}}. That spelling is the one on the cover of the book of hers that's been translated into English (ASIN B013W2OSWI) and in most sources [1][2], but for some reason the Korea Literary Translation Institute uses the spelling "Su Rin" instead [3]. The Korean-language sources at Baik Sou-linne seem sufficient to me to pass WP:N but if someone disagrees they should nominate that article separately. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 04:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.