Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Sunda Strait earthquake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 12:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Sunda Strait earthquake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The earthquake magnitude might seem big, but it isn't significant enough for an article since there is only 1 injured, no mass casualty situation, even though houses are damaged that doesn't mean an article has to be created. Reego41 22:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Yet another prematurely created article and the impacts are too small to be notable. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore the morgue) 23:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – In my opinion we should only make articles out of recent events IF we have enough reliable sources that may prove the significance of the event. We should not rush when it comes to creating articles like this and wait for new information, and even while doing so you may try to expand your article until the sufficient information is published. Moctiwiki (Moctalk with me) 00:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:EVENT - lacks global news coverage and is unlikely to have a lasting impact. Mikenorton (talk) 12:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE - Hate to be the keeper of earthquake event articles, but this one needs to go. It was made too prematurely and the event has little to no reliable sources or news coverage to make it notable. Long story short, it just fails WP:EVENT. Hansen SebastianTalk 09:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DELETEFails WP:EVENT needs reliable sources to back the article up for significant coverage Juggyevil (talk) 14:18, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - is not worthy of notice. Occurred 100+km from land. Did not have any lasting or significant effects. No significant enduring coverage. Hence does not meet WP:EVENT Such-change47 (talk) 12:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.