Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2000–01 UE Lleida season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2000–01 UE Lleida season

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of the significant coverage required to pass WP:GNG. Sakiv (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sakiv (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I suspect that a WP:BEFORE would have yielded lots. The language in question would be Catalan or Spanish. UE Lleida played in a pro league and the season was noteworthy in that they went from almost-promotion to La Liga, to relegation in 2000–01. The chance of this season not being written about, I would rate around 1%. Is the nominator confusing with the 2001–02 UE Lleida season when Lleida played on the third tier? Geschichte (talk) 17:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No, I don't confuse this article with the 2001–02 article. In short, this article is in a very poor state. Your first argument is inaccurate. The team never got close to promotion.--Sakiv (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair I think that is referring to the quick change from 1999–2000 Segunda División which was very close to promotion, while 2000–01 Segunda División was a total collapse and relegation at the bottom of the table. Crowsus (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, only 3 points from promotion in June 2000, then relegated a year later. Geschichte (talk) 21:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:35, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete - yes this was from when the club was in a fully-pro league, so should meet NSEASONS, but where are the sources? Giant Snowman 20:42, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And where are the links? Readers shouldn't really need to go to a template (which isn't visible on all mobile views) to get something as basic as the league division article for that season - and I've just seen that only got added today. It can be rescued with sources IMO but will any effort be made in that regard, as none was made in its first decade+ of existence? Crowsus (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 19:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: While I'm not well versed in finding WP:SIGCOV for seasons, per nom this subject appears to be lacking. For @Geschichte:'s comment and in light of WP:GF, I think we can presume nom completed a WP:BEFORE and ultimately didn't find any relevant material, which was the same result I had. For @Sakiv:'s response as well as a later comment by @Crowsus:, the current state of the article doesn't matter per WP:PERFECTION as it can always improve over time. The major issue for me, as nom originally put and echoed by @GiantSnowman: is that the article currently fails GNG since no one can find sources even though there are assumptions they should exist. Until they're found, if they're ever found, I must lean delete. GauchoDude (talk) 13:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.