Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/15 Saint Bridget Prayers
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirected to Bridget of Sweden. Text here has been transwikied to Wikisource. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:41, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 15 Saint Bridget Prayers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not appropriate for Wikipedia. An article about the prayers might be. Little Red Riding Hoodtalk 03:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep — I agree that it should be an article about the prayers, and it definitely needs a lot of work, but deleting a notable article with tons of potential just because it is currently unwikified leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Cerebellum (talk) 11:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - does Wikisource want this kind of material? This would appear to be entirely source text from the public domain. My impulse would be to transwiki and delete without prejudice to an article about the devotion itself. But only the introductory text contains anything that would help make this a proper article. The devotion probably does merit a mention on the appropriate St. Bridget page. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - Wikisource already has s:The Revelations of Saint Birgitta. Definite transwiki and delete. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note further. I transwikied this to Wikisource, with minor formatting changes: s:16 Prayers of St. Bridget. Technically this makes this a speedy delete candidate. I won't do that immediately, in case someone wants to write an article on the prayers themselves. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - To Saint Bridget of Sweden. They are alreay listed there. Thanks ShoesssS Talk 18:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.