Theindianicon

Welcome!

Hello, Theindianicon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Theindianicon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Amortias (T)(C) 17:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Theindianicon

A tag has been placed on User:Theindianicon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Amortias (T)(C) 17:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Theindianicon (talk) 17:46, 27 July 2014 (UTC) The sources on the article are variable, one of the source is patent journal of government of India (http://www.ipindia.nic.in/ipr/patent/journal_archieve/journal_2012/pat_arch_042012/official_journal_20042012_part_i.pdf)

As well as the article is also written in unbiased way.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Theindianicon (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

The article is of importance because the person is involved with the mathematical and IT inventions, patents, and Indian media has highlighted his works. Look following press article: http://www.bhaskar.com/article/c-16-665295-NOR.html The article is in Hindi, but it must be noted that concerned media house publishing this article, namely, Dainik Bhaskar, is the largest newspaper group of India. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dainik_Bhaskar)

MfD nomination of User:Theindianicon

User:Theindianicon, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Theindianicon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Theindianicon during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Amortias (T)(C) 18:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Ankur Tiwari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ankur Tiwari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ankur Tiwari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Notes on supercomputing and division by zero

Hi Ankur,

I'm guessing you haven't had the opportunity to discuss your work with professional mathematicians and computer scientists. The division by zero work shows that you are able to "think outside the box", but it's not a particularly interesting observation. (When I was about your age, I figured out I could create a valid mathematics where a>a; for someone with just a high school mathematics background, this was terribly exciting, but once you figure out that abstract algebra exists, it's not nearly so impressive.)

Your "supercomputing" work seems to have reinvented symbolic arithmetic, which has been around since at least the early 1970s.

If one of your goals is to have your own wikipedia article, let me point you to WP:ACADEMIC. The coin-of-the-realm is your h-index, the maximum value of n where n is the number of papers you've published that have been cited in at least n other papers. Erik Demaine is around 50, and he's definitely notable enough for a wikipedia article. Mine is clocking in at 10 and I'm definitely not notable. A full professor in CompSci at an American research university should have an h-index of around 20, and that's a good baseline for a en.WP notability as well. Patents tend not to count, as they aren't peer reviewed.

So anyway, you might want to worry a lot less about your marketing and redirect that energy into getting into a good graduate school.

Best,

Lesser Cartographies (talk) 15:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Kinu ^t/_c 20:24, 10 August 2014 (UTC)