User talk:TerraCyprus/Archives/2021/09

Category editing

Hi, Could you please explain why you are changing the cat for (Israeli settlements) that are located (in the West Bank) to a cat using an Israeli internal designation for an administrative area? Selfstudier (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Because it is more specific and is an intersection. And for the record, I put them into "Israeli settlements in the West Bank" just shortly before. You can read more about the topic at the article Israeli settlement. TerraCyprus (talk) 13:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

It is wrong. Just look at the articles themselves to see that. Kindly restore the previous cats. Thank you.Selfstudier (talk) 13:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

What is wrong? TerraCyprus (talk) 13:26, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

The cats need to reflect the article content, the places you are editing are physically located in the West Bank.Selfstudier (talk) 13:28, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Please provide an example where the category is wrong. TerraCyprus (talk) 13:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

In every case where there is an Israeli settlement in the West Bank and you have changed it to J&S area (an Israeli internal administrative division).Selfstudier (talk) 13:31, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Where did I change that? TerraCyprus (talk) 13:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

FTR: I sorted the settlements in Category:Israeli settlements into to geographical subcategories and moved those articles that where not about settlements or sets thereof into Category:Israeli settlement according to the category description. Sometimes I also removed the category "Judea and Samaria Area" when the new Category:Israeli settlements in the Judea and Samaria Area was added since the latter is a subcategory of the former e.g. Sdeh Bar Farm TerraCyprus (talk) 14:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

You may wish to comment hereSelfstudier (talk) 18:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Category:Israeli settlements in the Judea and Samaria Area has been nominated for deletion

Category:Israeli settlements in the Judea and Samaria Area has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Huldra (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

IP area

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Selfstudier (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

FTR: I am not aware that I have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. TerraCyprus (talk) 13:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

See above discussion re cats, these are edits, subject to the above restrictions, in the IP area. If you don't actually realize that, then that's another reason to stop doing what you are doing.Selfstudier (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

My edits have nothing to do with the conflict. TerraCyprus (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

If you edit a page that has the IP area notice on it, which all the ones you have been editing do, they are defined as being part of the conflict. If you prefer I will have an administrator explain this to you.Selfstudier (talk) 13:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

I didn't ask for that explanation. I just am not aware that I did show interest in the conflict. If one is editing a typo on one of the pages, I would not consider this a show of interest in the conflict neither. Please stop trolling. TerraCyprus (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

That is a required notification prior to requesting sanctions for violating the arbitration decision. WP:WESTBANK was a result of an arbcom case and it is binding on users, and further violations, now that you have been notified, may be reported to arbitration enforcement. That is not trolling, which is likewise a straightforward personal attack. nableezy - 17:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)