User talk:Steven (WMF)/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Why so coy?

You accuse me of having said things I have not and of holding views that I do not. Then, when confronted with your lies you blank your page. That's completely unacceptable, especially for a WMF employee, and if you persist I will certainly escalate this. Malleus Fatuorum 21:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

I summarized your opinion in a way you didn't like, which is hardly a lie. Mike came to me with a reasonable comment that merited a reply, but you are just trolling here. This my talk page, not a forum you get to beat into submission in some drama-laden crusade to right a non-existent wrong. Move on, there is nothing to see here. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:15, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

No, you lied. Malleus Fatuorum 21:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't care it is a simple mistake, or something else. It is not satisfactory for someone using a WMF account to egregiously misrepresent a good comment (I don't care about good faith—the comment was good), and then refuse to even say something like that they don't have time to examine the issue and they are sorry if they misinterpreted something. NPP is important, and misrepresenting good comments in an area under active WMF consideration is not good enough. Being called on a mistake is not trolling. Johnuniq (talk) 00:46, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

It is in WMF-World apparently. Malleus Fatuorum 02:39, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Harassment by User:Nikosgreencookie

After adding a tag to the article on Takis Fotopoulos to let editors know that it is based on primary sources and/or sources affiliated with the subject (such as the "Democracy & Nature" and "Inclusive Democracy" publications/websites that belong to Fotopoulos), the aforementioned user has started accusing me on my Talk page of vandalism. If you have a look at his Talk page, you will see that he is a supporter of Mr. Fotopoulos and quite militant about promoting the movement started by Mr. Fotopoulos and defending it. On the Talk page of the article on Takis Fotopoulos, I saw signs of a possible violation of WP:OWN and perhaps the supporters of Mr. Fotopoulos are moving to a violation of WP:MEAT, as they keep recruiting people to "defend" Mr. Fotopoulos from what they seem to perceive as "attackers" and "enemies". It all looks a bit like what happened with the heavy editing wars that Church of Scientology members carried out here on Wikipedia. Could you please help me out? I only want to ensure that contributors - many of whom are far more knowledgeable than me - will bring out better articles, yet I get accuse of "vandalism" because of my humble efforts. Thank you. SentientContrarian (talk) 10:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but as a staff person I can't help you with this issue. You should ask a volunteer administrator, or otherwise use a normal dispute resolution process. Thanks, Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Steven (WMF). You have new messages at 28bytes's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JSTOR

The JSTOR signup page is up. See Wikipedia:Requests for JSTOR access Raul654 (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

What a splendid way to begin...

What a splendid way to begin Good Friday!

I am delighted with your recognition of my editing Wikipedia over the past seven months.

Thank you,

Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 07:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Thank you

Hello, Steven (WMF). You have new messages at OwenBlacker's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"the foundation"

See this, in case you know the right people for this problem. It isn't really a wmf issue, but perhaps help would help. tedder (talk) 16:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Answered. :) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 16:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello and thank you (Merhaba ve teşekkürler) for barnstar. The number is very nice, but I still don't know how to put a sign that I have a message for you, so I am writing here. I will continue to add some info regarding them. Thanks again Egeymi (talk) 19:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar

Thanks, appreciate it! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 19:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

I would also like to thank you

Thank you very much for the barnstar. Nbdelboy Nbdelboy 22.10 13 April 2012 (GMT)

Hello, Steven (WMF). You have new messages at Egeymi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Barnstar

D'aww, thanks! --flying idiot 22:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

My thanks too for the Barnstar, I had no idea I was passing some sort of milestone. Torn between thinking "Gosh, that's a lot" and thinking how long it took me to get here... Skteosk (talk) 09:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello, Steven (WMF). You have new messages at Egeymi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

here

Hi Steven

I have left a message for you at the above, and am letting you know here, as I am not sure if you watch that page. Mrlittleirish 10:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar

Wow, thanks so much, your online support means a lot to those of us working behind the scenes to make Wikipedia a quality site --Mugregg

Thanks for the WikiChevrons 

Errr WOW,.. thanks :D and no I was not aware of the milestone number of edits, amazing how they mount up --Thefrood (talk) 22:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Please review edit to JSTOR access requests page

Hi, Steven. I was about to request JSTOR access at the page for that, but decided to poke around a bit, first, to see whether one of my local public libraries provides a free gateway to the archive. I couldn't find anything at all about it on any of the websites for public library I have access to, but then found this list on the JSTOR site itself. I checked that list for the name of my public library, and found that I do indeed have access to JSTOR already, at no cost.

I went back to my library site again, and eventually found an obscure notice of that on a library subpage, along with instructions for accessing it there. If we're only getting access, via the current program, in increments of 1,000 users at a time, then it makes sense to conserve those for users who don't have access through a library, yes?

With that motivation I've boldly edited the intro text to the JSTOR access requests page in this edit. Feel free to revert or modify it if my action puts a spanner in the works for some reason I'm unaware of, e.g. relations with JSTOR. I've posted this same message to Mark's talk, as well. Thanks very much for your work on this. Cheers,  – OhioStandard (talk) 03:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

JSTOR

Hi Steven, I left a question for you here in case you missed it. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 21:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Replied! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:33, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar Steven

I appreciate it.Wa3frp (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	to all of the contributors to the April 30, 2012 Recent Research report in the Signpost for the good work there! Pine(talk) 07:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Pine! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 19:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks no end!!

Hi Steven, and a great word of thanks from me for your barnstar! I feel very happy for this award is very dear to me. I hope I can contact you in case I need help with some articles.--Sainsf <^> (talk) 07:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey

Maybe you get tired of hearing, but thank you for the barnstar. Esc2003 (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!! Very gratified!!

Hi Steven. Thanks for your vote of confidence. Its good to know somebody reads my stuff. Early C19 biography and encyclopaedias are very esoteric areas of knowledge, I suggest. Now I've retired I want to get as much on WP as I can. Kind regards, Apwoolrich (talk) 19:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you !!

Thank you very much,for Barnstar Star.Best Regards! Knightserbia (talk) 19:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!

Yes, I did a lot of edits on it.wiki, but really didn't know having reached 1k edit also here. Thanks a lot for your message!--F Ceragioli (talk) 17:00, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Editor Engagement page

Hi Steven, I've been looking at this - very interesting stuff. The thought occurs that some time in the autumn we shall be hitting 4 million pages on the English WP if the present rate of growth of new pages keeps up. There is sure to be much media interest, and this could be the time to put the word out about getting new editors. Kind regards Apwoolrich (talk) 06:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Talk Back

Hello, Steven (WMF). You have new messages at TheSpecialUser's talk page.
Message added 04:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

→TSU ^tp* 04:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

IP editor engagement

I've recently noticed a significant increase in the number of IP editors who, much to my surprise, are making constructive edits to areas that I watch. Perhaps you could investigate if this is part of a broader trend and how these editors could be encouraged to stay as a part of the editor engagement efforts. Pine^✉ 21:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

We did a basic analysis of the number of IP edits last summer, but we should update it for sure. In any case, trying ways to specifically reach out to anonymous editors who are making good contributions and prompt them to "join up" is most definitely in our backlog of ideas. In addition, there is a fellowship focused on recruiting new editors (primarily with banners and special landing pages) in smaller Wikipedias, like Arabic. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 19:13, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Steven (WMF). Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Pine^✉ 10:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Research namespace

Thanks I learned something new today (I guess I can go to sleep now). I didn't even know there was a such a thing as a Research namespace. Do you have a list of all the name spaces? I would be interested to know if there are others that have excaped my attention. Kumioko (talk) 19:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Steven (WMF). You have new messages at Wikipedia:Gadget/proposals#Easy_.22leave_a_comment.22_gadget.
You can remove this notice at any time.

E3 questions

Hi Steven, in addition to Wikipedia:E3 emailing users who last edited X number of days ago to invite them to return, has there been any consideration of emailing "exit surveys" to Wikipedians who put Retired notices on their talk pages, as mentioned here? Pine^✉ 06:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Yep, we tested this as one of our first experiments. See full results. The summary is that A) because we don't email spam people a lot and other reasons, we have much higher open rates than is standard, B) a few people returned to editing, but in some of the most successful cases it was roughly the same amount as would return naturally on their own, C) for now our infrastructure doesn't support testing better emails (e.g., HTML newsletter-style mail, as opposed to plain text). All those things add up to the idea that we shouldn't just start emailing lapsed people en masse just yet. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 16:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Let me clarify. I was asking if anyone had asked why people leave, not if they would consider returning. I think I saw some survey asking what prevents people from editing more, but this is a different question. Pine^✉ 06:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, there has been at least one former contributors survey. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:57, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, good to know. What actions have been taken to address the results? WMF recently hired an expert on DR, and the visual editor is coming. Have actions been taken to address the other recommendations? Pine^✉ 22:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, there's also the help documentation project of The wub as a Fellow. As for what I can directly help work on, I would say that #3 and #4 are things that are potentially in the experimental backlog for my team. For #3, we're strongly considering task recommendations as a thing to tackle, even as early as post-registration. For #4, there are various automated or editor-led ways we could test marking 'good newbies' and in general discouraging conflict (see this as an example). If there's something you're particularly enthusiastic about, I'd be happy to hear it. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:39, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, please do task recommendations per #3, maybe by asking a user what there interests are when they register and pointing them in useful directions and suggesting relevant, brief readings on help topics, tutorials, policies, WikiProjects, and places to ask questions like the Teahouse. You could also correlate a user's interests when they register with analysis of what users subsequently do in their time on Wikipedia. For #4, I like Eloquence's suggestion and would support doing that as an experiment after some notice and consultation with the community of whichever language wikis will host the experiment. Pine^✉ 00:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Since you appear to know how to do the meta testing...

About a month ago I responded to an editor who said he was leaving Wikipedia. The editor was making quality contributions and hadn't been contacted by other editors (other than the welcome template left on his talk page). It appears that the issue concerning the editor was the red warning displayed when there are unbalanced ref tags. Do you think you, or some group at WMF could take a look at alternatives that would still be noticeable enough for a change to be made? A possible alternative could be the blue superscripted hyperlink. It might also make sense to include a hidden category like Category:articles with unbalanced ref tags. It is an easy fix to make, and it would ensure that instances of that don't get missed. Ryan Vesey Review me! 03:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey Steven, I was just wondering if this was something that might interest the WMF at all. Ryan Vesey 21:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

I can definitely tell you I've heard other new editors say this was intimidating. There's a couple ways we should be trying to work around this ... first, the Visual Editor should be fixing this problem for everyone by automatically handling insertion of references. We should make sure that's a feature requirement prior to rollout. Second, as the article creation work being done should handle this by having newbies directed to an experience where the appropriate references structure is inserted for them. I'll make sure those two things are brought up. In the meantime, I absolutely agree we could use a hidden category like that, so that we can create a queue for experienced editors or a bot. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Speaking of which, when will the Article Creation Landing System be rolled out? David1217 ^{What I've done} 14:07, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

We don't have a firm ETA at the moment; Brandon wants to give another pass at redesigning it. At the moment we're prioritising the New Pages software so that we don't accidentally boost the number of incoming articles before we have a good way of dealing with them :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Makes sense. So is it in the range of the end of the year, six months, or a year from now? David1217 ^{What I've done} 02:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

I'd say closer in the 6 month time frame (which is also end of the year), but don't hold me to that, please. The E2 team is headed into "Echo" territory, which may take up a LOT of time.--Jorm (WMF) (talk) 03:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

That's the new messages feed (very cool) which is being developed together with the LiquidThreads successor, right? And when is that projected to be finished? (Sorry for pestering you, Jorm.) David1217 ^{What I've done} 03:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#en.wikipedia.g-webs.com

I wanted to inform you of a possible trademark violation by a mirror website being discussed on the Village Pump. Chris857 (talk) 00:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

ARS-Deletionists

Sue the ExecDir sent me to you, because you are very involved in deletionism. One of my two goals at Wikimania is to get a abdiscussion about the problem, and perhaps some tweaking of the standards. I plan to start a session at the Unconference about the issue. I would welcome your attendance and support.--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:57, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, I will be around Sunday for the unconference and will be sure to look for your sessions. :) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Steven (WMF). Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Beeblebrox (talk) 17:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

User warning templates for AFT5

Hi Steven, and Oliver suggested we talk to you about it. When you get a chance would you mind having a look at them, they're at User:Callanecc/sandbox/AFT5. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:26, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Testing on French Wikipedia

Bonjour Steven

The Projet:Aide et accueil is currently debating about the new features (the AFT and the visual editor), and how we can participate to the testing period. I'll try to drive the discussion and lead it to a Q&A list for you and the team of both projects, before september.

Please answer me back on my FR talk page. :)

Thank you ! Trizek ^{here or on wpfr} 11:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia (search) user interface and helping new users

Hi Steven,

Here I made some suggestions for some very simple Wikipedia search interface improvements that would surely result in more Wikipedia volunteers, and your name was mentioned as someone who might be interested. (Please scroll down to the bottom of that post for a very brief summary of the essentials of my suggestion).

You must be very busy, but I believe that this would surely make everybody's job easier by:

• giving the user a choice of search results, as Google does, and
• "advertising" where prospective Wikipedia volunteers can learn more...

Best regards LittleBen (talk) 02:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Level one user warnings consensus

Hi Steven. I see you that you reverted Maryana at {{uw-vandalism1}} while she was attempting to implement the consensus of the user warnings RFC. I'm sure there was a good reason... but what exactly needs to be tested before implementation? — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Ah... I see from your contribs that you are sandboxing it in a non-standard location. Fair enough, then! — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:29, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, there were just some issues with the markup (it was transcluding the docs in, for instance). Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

(Tp stalker) Yep, we decided to sandbox them all first and then implement the changes wholesale (turned out to be a lot more finicky markup issues than I expected... damn you, conditional expressions!). You can take a look at all the drafts here – we'll work on putting them into their proper place bright and early tomorrow :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 04:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Opt-in for post-edit feedback?

Hi Steven! (I see you used to be a fellow Oregonian—cool!) Is there anyway I can opt-in to seeing the post-edit feedback feature you've been working on? I know it says that this will only be for new users, but sometimes I work with newbies, and I'd like to see how the feature works. If there is no technical way, that's okay. Thanks, David1217 ^{What I've done} 03:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey David, thanks for your interest! There is no way in your preferences to opt-in, because the experiment data should include only newly-registered editors. However, there is a way anyone can see what the post-edit feedback looks like... every browser has a console built in that will let you play with JavaScript functions, and there is one line that I can give you which will make the post-edit feedback appear. If you tell me what browser your're on, I can walk you through it. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:34, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Also, BTW, is the change you made to uw-vandalism1 one that needs to be replicated across the other WP:WARN templates that got updated yesterday? Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 17:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

I am using Safari 5.1.7 on a MacBook Air running OS X 10.6.8. Thanks for letting me check out the feature! About the templates: it's not a big deal, just something I noticed and fixed. If you'd like to fix it, that's great, but don't go out of your way. It's just a little apostrophe, after all. David1217 ^{What I've done} 01:34, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay, if you're using Safari, here's the steps to see it in action:

1. Visit any English Wikipedia article while logged in
2. Go to the Develop menu, which you may need to check as enabled in Preferences, under Advanced
3. Choose 'Show Error Console'.
4. That console will include a text box with a prompt (it looks like a blue arrow). At the console prompt, enter mw.experiments.showFeedback('Your edit has been saved.') and hit enter. That should force the post-edit feedback message to appear for its normal few seconds.

Let me know how that goes. :) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 20:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

The feature isn't much, but I like it! Thanks! David1217 ^{What I've done} 00:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello again Steven! I saw that more post-edit feedback is on its way. Could I have the code to see the new messages? Thanks, David1217 ^{What I've done} 22:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Sure, in a console, you can use mw.e3.pef.showFeedback( { bucketName: 'historical', editCount: number, messages: { historical: { number: "Text!" } } } ), replacing number with 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100. If you want to see what they look like without using a console, there are screenshots here. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 22:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Echo Test

a-oooo-gah!--Jorm (WMF) (talk) 20:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Silly guy. Wrong wiki. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 20:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Village Stocks

		You have been sentenced to the Village Stocks
		For being the WMF's scapegoat after Wikipedia was told to refuse traffic from the entire world. Ryan Vesey 21:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay, this was funny in IRC, but seriously.... it's User:Asher Feldman and all of ops you should be putting in stocks over this. They're the ones that made the stupid mistake here. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I meant for it to be all in good humor and I noted that you were the scapegoat. Feel free to remove or modify it. Ryan Vesey 21:18, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, it's okay. You just have a better sense of humor than I do. :) Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:19, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

There's probably a name for this but I dunno what it is

I'm sure you're probably watching the page, but here's a note to inform you or ask you to pop by or something because you're kind of involved in the matter about this uw1 thing. Yes. Please. Thanks. Something. Cake?

But seriously, any light you could shed on the matter would be appreciated. -— Isarra ༆ 18:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

AFT5 user warnings

Hi Steven, you helped out a few weeks ago with creating user warning templates for AFT5. I've pretty much started from scratch so they will be different to what you helped with. Would you mind having a look? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry the link is: User:Callanecc/sandbox/AFT5. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Steven I've made some more changes, would you mind having a look for me. I planning for this to be a final draft before I ask for comments at WT:AFT5 so any help or advice you have would be appreciated. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Uw-vandalism0 is broken

Template:Uw-vandalism0 is broken, and I'm going blind trying to understand why. If you boldly change something you don't like, please be careful not to break it. Here's what it does:

Hello, I'm Lexein. I wanted to let you know that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barbie, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. If you wish to discuss this, you can do so here, or at my Talk page. Thank you.

--Lexein (talk) 01:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Before, it was dumping template code. What was that? Nevermind. --Lexein (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Shoulda said "it was only broken for about 10 minutes". Seems ok now. Sry. --Lexein (talk) 04:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

No worries. I should have tested it in my sandbox first and proposed the changes, but I was hasty. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 04:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

The feedback dashboard

After reading the latest topic on the pertaining talk-page, I think the feedback dashboard does not really work well, at least at the moment. Would it be feasible (I am not tech-savvy enough to know) to introduce some possibility for users to mark feedbacks as unhelpful or simply not worthy answering (I do that now with hiding the feedbacks from time to time, but I am admin)? Lectonar (talk) 09:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

One thing that could help is allowing anyone logged in to hide feedback. Hiding/unhiding is not deletion, so it's not necessarily something that is traditionally limited to admins. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 18:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

I've requested that change now, and it should go live next week, if it passes code review. Let's talk more about other ways to make FeedbackDashboard less of a pain and more rewarding for everybody. I would hate to see it stagnate anymore. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 00:54, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the fast reaction, very much appreciated. The greatest problem I see at the moment is the lack of participation of experienced users in answering feedbacks, but I really haven't the faintest idea how to get people interested in it. There is a certain underlying...hostility is too strong a word, but adversion would be perhaps be ok, of many long time users against new ideas and concepts (read the talk page of the WP:Teahouse to get the idea), and newer and more enthusiastic users normally lack the wiki-knowledge. Lectonar (talk) 06:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Font problem fixed

Hi Steven, I left you a note here in case you miss it. Many thanks for the advice about how to go about restoring my font. All the best, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

AdBlock Plus

AdBlock Plus allows me to hide it with the following rule:

piramido.wmflabs.org##DIV#postedit-container

They (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks for testing it! Feel free to note the rule on VPT. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 23:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

I did, and you boldy updated it to work here. Thanks. They (talk) 23:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Note

• meta:Talk:Requests_for_comment/Global_bans#Wikimedia_community

Just thought I would let you know I linked to your talk page as an example. - jc37 04:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Regarding blog post: "Fix this broken workflow..."

Regarding the blog post "Fix this broken workflow, and help thousands of Wikipedians" on blog.wikimedia: Are you aware that the Article Creation Workflow team has been working on the same idea? Sure, according to the project status, it is on hold, but still. I am getting the feeling that the WMF is duplicating it´s efforts by having two teams on this.--Snaevar (talk) 02:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Yep, in fact, my team may end up taking over the project, since its first step involves our forte, an A/B test. We described roughly the same project but didn't link to the landing page and its design specifications, because the audience of that post is developers. We're using this example project as a way to show potential engineering hires what exactly we do. Compare this to the old internal tech hiring task, where we asked people to show how they would architect a bug tracker. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 03:00, 26 October 2012 (UTC)