Squeezety

Your edits to Garth Turner

As I noted in my edit summary here, the purpose of an article's lead (as explained at WP:LEAD) is to summarize the article's contents, so it's natural and indeed expected that material in the lead will be redundant. I hope this clarifies things. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Note

Please stop. If you continue to violate the Manual of Style for article lead sections, as you did in Garth Turner, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MBisanz ^talk 15:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked for a period of for 31 hours for violating WP:LEAD at Garth Turner. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. MBisanz ^talk 02:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued disruptive editing and also personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

You have continued this disruptive behaviour right after being blocked for it, and have now insulted the other editor involved. In future, when you disagree about article content, please discuss it politely on the article's Talk page, and if necessary follow the guidelines at dispute resolution. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 14:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)