Sp3000
RfD nomination of Wikipedia Monster
editI have nominated Wikipedia Monster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Floaterfluss (talk) (contribs) 22:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
editPossibly unfree Image:AndoncO.JPG
editAn image that you uploaded or altered, Image:AndoncO.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaK 09:04, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Selby Shattered.JPG
editThanks for uploading Image:Selby Shattered.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
The Mole
editHi mate,
Just wanted to thank you for your partial work on The Mole Season 6 page. I really hoped you enjoyed this season, though it was a shame that terrible ratings resulted in the show being shafted to late at night. MasterMind5991 (talk) 12:10, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
I strongly doubt it will return next year, given the low ratings the show received (for all the anticipation building up to its return in July). Too many episodes before a termination and the production was a shambles. And the reveal was a bit of an anti-climax as well (in the past, the final three would be locked up in a shed or something, and there are great effects revealing the winner and the traitor). But do you think the show was considered a success, even in a late timeslot? I wouldn't say so, as most kids would be in bed by then. MasterMind5991 (talk) 21:49, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day
editHi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Glamour (Charmed) listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glamour (Charmed). Since you had some involvement with the Glamour (Charmed) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC)