Russia666777

July 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 2001 Belarusian presidential election. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 21:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Results

I have the book the results are sourced to and they are correct. It is not usual practice to include the invalid votes when calculating the percentage, hence why the figures from the book are as they are.

You have also used an incorrect total number of votes, and your blind revert removed the number of registered voters and messed up the images in the infobox (which I had equalised in size). Please restore the article to its previous state and withdraw your personal attack. Number 57 21:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

 "incorrect total number of votes" funny boy, I didn't even edited them because I thought they were already correct. also I picked results from there
 https://traccc.gmu.edu/sites/default/files/14459.pdf. And no, I will not withdraw anything. I just want peoples to see correct information!

OK, then please consider this a final warning. If you reinstate material that is contrary to the source used in the article, and blindly revert other changes made to the article again, I will be requesting your account is blocked from editing. In the meantime, you are welcome to discuss the matter at Talk:2001 Belarusian presidential election and try and gain consensus for your proposed changes. Please familiarise yourself with WP:BRD, an expected behaviour on en.wiki. Thanks, Number 57 09:33, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

If you revert or make personal attacks again, I will be requesting your account is blocked – your next revert will take you over WP:3RR. I have the source open in front of me, and the percentage is given as in the article. What other language wikipedias say is irrelevant – Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Please understand that invalid votes are not normally taken into account when calculating percentages, hence why the secondary source being used in this article has figures it does. Number 57 16:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

This is simply absurd, you have read only one book that is not even made in Belarus and has nothing to do with it, and you use the pretext that it is allegedly written there that Lukashenka scored 77%. If you didn’t know many Belarusian internet portals, as well as Russian ones, and lastly, the Central Election Commission of Belarus, they say that Lukashenko got exactly 75.65%, please check it yourself. Goodbye.

As you broke the 3RR rule, you have been reported here. Number 57 16:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for maintaining an account that is only used for edit warring and incivility.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)