User talk:Ral315/Archive 30

edit History Archives: Dec. 04 to Feb. 06 Mar. 06 to Feb. 07 Feb. 07 to May. 08 Jun. 08 to Present 2004-2005: 01 · 02 · 03 · 04 · 05 · 06 · 07 · 08 2006: 09 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 2007: 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 2008: 29 · 30 · 31 · 32

Signpost search

I don't know whether you already know this, or whether you might be interested, but {{Google custom}} can search the Signpost and its archive pages. I suggested adding some search links here:

• Template talk:SignpostNavigation#Would this template like a search link?
• Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives#Search link?

I use this particular search in the course of answering Help desk questions, when I recall some Signpost article that pertains to someone's question, and I want to look it up. I thought you might find it useful. Some users found similar searches useful on the FAQ and Village pump. So I'm kind of looking around for other large sets of archived pages that people might like to search. --Teratornis (talk) 08:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Sister Projects Interviews

I have an idea on making a series on weekly interviews with admins on other sister projects (e.g. wikibooks, wikitonary, wikispecies, etc.) and summarize the interview on Signpost. What do you think? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 14:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Don Murphy

What was the point of doing what you did (being intentionally ambiguous here)? Why not just tell the oversighters about it? John Reaves 20:23, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Ralbot

Do you want Newsletterbot to take care of the Signpost deliveries? I suppose that's your choice. Anyways, if you would like it to, there are a simple set of instructions on the page. Just being bold and asking. Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 23:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Not at this point; I appreciate the offer. Ral315 (talk) 02:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost delivery

Hi Ral315. I really appreciate the delivery of signpost by Ralbot and I've noticed it's been a little erratic lately. I was wondering if there was anything I could do to help. (Though I notice the post above whch may be a more useful offer). -- SiobhanHansa 00:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Day of Spring!

Happy First Day of Spring!

A Beautiful Cherry Tree in Spring Bloom

Theres nothing like seeing a field full of spring flowers.

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}!
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks. (Signing for time purposes). Ral315 (talk) 04:30, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:WikipediaSignpostHead.svg

Hi, I noticed you uploaded a new version of Image:WikipediaSignpostHead.svg, which I noted with thanks. However, today I noticed that although you wrote "(Complete re-working of prior SVG from scratch. My efforts go into the public domain.)" and "Remade from scratch by Ral315 using the "Certificate" font." it actually matches dot for dot with my new version, labeled as "crisper version" which was made using the Wedding Text font, not the certificate font.

Compared to the Wedding Text version, it has the same number of nodes, and the nodes perfectly line up. When I made the "crisper version" I had checked and I can tell you that Wedding Text and Certificate do not line up so perfectly.

Which makes me suspect that your version was not a re-working from scratch, but was based on my work. Can you explain this? Thanks. --Kjoonlee 14:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm very very sorry about this; I jumped to conclusions without really checking. My memory was incorrect and I was wrong. I apologize for any bad feelings you might have had. I'm sorry. --Kjoonlee 14:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Favour

Hey, I have a favour to ask of you, in relation to the novels wikiproject. Could you maybe post a link to the project page, or post this

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels". We make no length distinction so all narrative prose fiction is of interest. This includes Novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories. Articles about the works themselves and the forms and genres.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! WilliamMThompson (talk) 10:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

onto the signpost. If you could reply onto my talk page that would be good, thanks.WilliamMThompson (talk) 10:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I completely understand, you wouldn't have any ideas of where I could post something like that would you? It would be a great help.WilliamMThompson (talk) 05:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Template:Announcements/Community_bulletin_board. Daniel (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost - News and notes section

Little snippet for the next News and Notes section - Welsh Wicipedia has reached 15,000 articles. The milestone article is Polydore Vergil. —  Tivedshambo  _(t/c) 06:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

About my story

Hi! Did you see my response to your comment on my talk page? Please let me know what you decided about this. I spent quite a bit of work on this piece and I'd like to find some other place to publish it if you won't take it. Thanks, --Zvika (talk) 07:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject reports

I’ve always found the WikiProject dispatches interesting. I was wondering how the WikiProjects were selected? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 23:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For the userpage fix. Acalamari 17:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Exposition

Hi, me again. Would it be possible for you to do an exposition on a wikiproject. DO you know what I mean? A reporter,such as myself, would go to a wikiproject. Like that of Led Zeppelin or the Beatles or any active wikiproject, and write a story on them. The subject would of course be chosen by you or anyone who is somewhat high up in the paper, if an inactive project was chosen, then it would probably help garner support for that particular project. I think it is a good idea, and the reason I haven't posted it on the tip line as of yet is because I thought it would besomewhat quicker if I were to go straight to the editor in cheif. I would be more than willing to write the stories, and it would involve little effort on your part. Reply to me on my talk page if that is alright. Thanks. WilliamMThompson (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost

how can I join the Wikipedia Signpost-- King Rock ^{Go 'Skins!} 00:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Awarding Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Aprils fools day was a blast. Loads of users lightened up to have good old fashion fun. I want to thank you for taking part in editing this page in particular and even though I may not know you, embrace the same talk pages, or even edit with you in the near future, I'd like to award you this Barnstar for making Wikipedia a fun environment in which to contribute. Until next year. :) SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Ralbot edit summary

Ral, I reckon one of the main ways that people become aware of the release of a new Signpost is Ralbot coming up on their watchlist. Therefore I think it would benefit a lot of readers if you linked to the edition from your edit summary e.g. "Signpost delivery using AWB" rather than "Signpost delivery using AWB". Cheers, Hesperian 09:50, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Hesperian 23:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost By Email

did there not used to be this feature. Is there anyway I can help reviatilize this? --The Placebo Effect (talk) 15:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Planned future articles for Signpost

Hi. Thanks for the Signpost. I'm wondering about getting an article (or two) planned for a future edition. I'm planning an event for June and wanted to know what I need to do to get an article in there. Can anyone write it? There will likely be an advanced copy for review if you need such information. Likely, if we pull this off, you'll want to cover it during and after like you would any other event happening around this place. You can go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Image Monitoring Group#Wikipedia Image Cleanup Month .28June.29 to see what's being planning. If it's as simple as "write the article, we'll stick it in" that's great. If there are some guidelines to writing an article (layout, format, length, tone, whatever), it would be nice to know that in advance as well. Thanks for any information you can provide. MECU≈talk 23:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

RSS feed for Signpost (again)

I know this has been discussed before. I have some observations to which you might like to add confirmations, corrections or more detail:

• It appears to me that your publication process for Signpost articles is finalized by the move to something like Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/DATE/NAME where DATE is the nominal publication date and NAME is a page name related to the name of the Signpost article.
• The article title is a HTML "h2" element.
• The By-line directly follows the title and is a HTML "small" element, containing wikitext including Wikipedia Usernames.
• Typically, there is no subheading in a Signpost article
• Typically, there is no summary in a Signpost article.

If this is the case, it seems to me that the title, guid, pubDate, author, and link elements for a set of RSS feed items would be easy enough to extract. As I'm developing a feed aggregator for use on WikBack, I'm considering constructing something of the sort. --Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 22:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Monday's Signpost

Yes, I'll be able to do it. I'm actually back, but haven't got around to removing the template yet. :-) David Mestel^(Talk) 09:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

2,000th FA

Over on Wikinews (Wikinews interviews: The team behind the 2,000th featured Wikipedia article) I'm prepping to interview the folks that did what is effectively the 2,000th FA. Is there some way to coordinate this with the Signpost? --Brian McNeil /^talk 10:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

(But people should stop calling "it" the 2000th FA; there were five 2000th FAs.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Ral, on the same matter, we need an answer here, so we can plan for the April 14 Dispatch. Will this article be stand-alone, or do you want the April 14 Dispatch allocated to it? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Per SandyGeorgia's comment I'd say you really need to assign the "2,000th" to one article. Sure, picking this one is a somewhat arbitrary decision - but it is one where there's an interesting story behind the article. For future milestones (eg 2,500) you might want to consider promoting articles one at a time so you can unambiguously say "X" it the nth FA. This may smack of Cabal-esque behaviour and there are going to be some contributors disappointed in how you go about this, but picking an article which is useful for press purposes is something I feel should be taken into consideration. --Brian McNeil /^talk 08:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Most troubled by this line of reasoning; thank goodness Raul knows how to do his job fairly and correctly. 'Nuff said. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:59, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

My RFA has closed

My RFA that you weighed in on earlier has closed as no consensus to promote, at a final tally of 120/47/13. I thank you for your feedback and comments there, and I'm going to be considering all the various advice and comments presented. I might end up at RFA again some day, or not. If you see me there again in the future, perhaps you might consider a Support !vote. If not, not, and no hard feelings. The pen is still mightier than the mop! See you around, and thanks again. Lawrence § t/e 18:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Suitable for Signpost?

User: Kim Bruning has suggested my "AGF Challenge" at User:Filll/AGF Challenge as new questions for RfA: [1]. I did not intend them for that purpose: [2]. There have been quite a few interested in this, and I have been developing a second set of exercises and a third set is underway as well. --Filll (talk) 22:43, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. --Sharkface217 19:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost backups?

Hi Ral.

I noticed that every week, the Signpost seems to get farther and father behind. I know there are many reasons to this, but one of the biggest is due to regular stories not being written, and the editor in chief (currently you) being busy. I was thinking we could have a backup system for all the regulars, and an assistant editor in chief, so we can get it out on time earlier. Ever since I saw the Signpost, honestly, I thought it could use an overhaul, made easier to get it out on time. Could you give me comments on that? Soxred93 | talk bot 00:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost delivery problem.

Hello. I need to say something about the Wikipedia Signpost delivery. I have apparently not gotten the last issue sent to my talk page, despite my name being on the list. Could there possibly be any problem's or glitches that occoured in the deliveries? Whammies Were Here 16:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch :) Whammies Were Here 10:07, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject report

I was let down twice by a project, so I had to compromise, so I asked a few of the members of the BRC (who were online at the time) what they would think about a Signpost report. They agreed and so it went ahead. I'll try and get another project instead for next week. Sorry for all these delays, it gives the impression that I don't care about the Signpost, which is untrue. Regards, Rudget (review) 14:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Placeholder image discussion

Hi Ral, can you let me know the status of the Placeholder image article I've been working on? Is it likely to get included in the next Signpost? Is there anything I should be doing? Thanks for all your hard work. -Pete (talk) 18:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for publishing that, and for your edits! -Pete (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Signposts for subscribers

Where are the subscribed sign posts for April 7, 2008 and for this week? Please advise. Chris (talk) 01:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The signpost has not been released yet at all. Soxred93 | talk bot 04:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

School death threats.

Hey, has this been reported to the police? They may find it quite helpful as it kind of gives them the information they are looking for. Tiptoety ^talk 23:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Recent WikiProject report failings

Ral, I would like to sincerely apologise for my recent failings to produce a WikiProject report over the last three weeks. I am clearly at fault here, with either having had too much to do and forgetting or a nominee letting me down with the answers (but for this, at least, I must admit some fault as the questions did not get to their target soon enough). Once again, sorry. Kind regards, Rudget 17:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

You may also need to search for a new WikiProject reporter (or you could leave it out, depends on your personal preference) for and including the 21st April to mid-August. I'm on a long and extended wikibreak, and probably won't be active on Wikipedia for the duration of that time. Regards, Greman Knight. 17:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

FYI

You probably saw my post to the suggestions page, but just FYI the Wikinews article is at n:California student arrested in criminal threats made on Wikipedia (see statements about licensing permissions for use on Wikipedia, on the talk page of that article). We may try to do some sort of a follow-up piece as well. Cirt (talk) 16:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

n:Teen charged with 7 felonies related to threats made on Wikipedia, Wikinews interviews administrator who contacted police -- All of the news sources listed at the bottom came out after the previous article was published. Again with this one, best probably to cite those sources in addition to the article itself. Cirt (talk) 08:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Papers piling up on the doorstep

Err, would it be a bad thing to take someone else's user name off the list? Is there any check for, umm, date of last contribution vs. now to indicate when it might be superfluous? (Used to deliver papers, and not get paid, to professional sports people - always out-of-town, off-season, or worse, traded!) Shenme (talk) 06:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

PROD'ed article at DRV

An article that you {{prod}}'ed has been listed at DRV. Since you prodded it for WP:BLP concerns, you may well wish to follow up. GRBerry 16:12, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Helping out

Hey man, I've enjoyed the signpost for years and I'm very glad we have such dedicated folks working on it. Although I probably don't have enough time to make regular contributions author articles or do research, I'd like to help out if you need assistance. My mother was a professor of English, and I scored perfect on my verbal SAT/ACT way back in the day. Might there be a need for a grammar nazi? I'm not interested in titles or "editorship" or anything self-glorifying... but I knows how to speak the English really good. (JOKE!) I considered jumping right to the POST discussion area, but I thought it would be best to ask the editor himself if there is a need I might be able to meet. Please let me know if I may be of assistance.  :-) /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 02:07, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I will try to start next Sunday/Monday. Is there a document that outlines the flow process (as in, what lands where, when it gets moved to official status, etc)? /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:00, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

DOJ IP address article

• n:US Dept of Justice IP address blocked after 'vandalism' edits to Wikipedia -- and after that article came out (actually after the reporter read that article) there was this in PC Pro:

Sparkes, Matthew (April 29, 2008). "Department of Justice banned from Wikipedia". PC Pro. Dennis Publishing Limited. Retrieved 2008-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Hope that's helpful. Cirt (talk) 17:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

FYI DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) didn't want to do the dual-licensing disclaimer thing, because he would like for Wikinews to be credited. Cirt (talk) 21:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem Ral...Sorry..I have been very busy today and things have been happening in my personal life etc so I have not had time to look at everything until just now and I apologize. So yes....I agree to dual-licensing. I will put a disclaimer up on the articles talk page now. DragonFire1024 (talk) 22:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

FYI, he did that, see Diff. Cirt (talk) 22:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost self-censorship?

Re: Newyorkbrad. Media is not supposed to be nice. Media is supposed to inform the public. People have the right to know that an ArbCom member have left. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 08:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

• Ral, please just state in a visible place (ie. not the page history) that you are aware of the story. There seem to be several camps at the moment: (1) Those who think the Signpost will completely ignore this until there is something more to report (ie. a replacement or further news); (2) Those who think the Signpost will over-report this and do an in-depth report; and (3) Those who think the Signpost will just state the bare facts of the departure and no more. But that discussion will come later. This is about clumsy attempts to forestall human nature. At the moment, you (and others) are merely removing notes people are leaving. There have been at least three independent notes left for you about this: 1 and removal, 2 and removal, 3 and removal. This is not about respecting a departed user's wishes, and it is not about self-censorship either. This is about you communicating with those wondering what the Signpost will say. A short statement from you on those pages, saying that you are aware of the story, and are prepared to discuss by e-mail, will stop further notes - just saying this in the edit summaries is not getting the message across. Saying something brief and to the point is sometimes better than just removing stuff. See what I said here. Carcharoth (talk) 09:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

possible story

Didn't want to leave it on the tip line page, regarding the recent retirement, and feel free to delete it here as well. But we are trying to get together a collaboration on Learned Hand, arguably the most important judge in the history of the US not on the Supreme Court, in honor of the recently retired. If you think that would be worth mentioning, I think those of us involved would welcome the help. The subject is an important one, as I've found out in the past few hours, and bears certain positive characteristics of our recent retired arbitrator, as well. Anyway, just an idea. Feel free to remove it. John Carter (talk) 21:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Late Signpost?

Is it delayed again? And I recall seeing you stating that you're going to write a procedure on it in case it's late. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 01:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Wow, it's almost late for a week OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 06:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, well, see below. Not surprising, really. But hey, let's all help out with next week's issue! :-) Carcharoth (talk) 10:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Tough decision, but the right one

Hi Ral. I'd like to express my support here for the decision you made to publish the article in the Signpost about Newyorkbrad's departure, and the note you published here. I think you handled this well. Carcharoth (talk) 10:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, me too. It's obviously a very difficult situation, but I think you made a good call. the wub "?!" 16:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Agreed, and thanks for mentioning the possible collaboration. With any luck, you might have to publish a note indicating the article's promotion sometime soon as well. :) John Carter (talk) 16:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Concur. The balance has indeed been struck. Anthøny 21:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Cartoon link has wrong name

The cartoon in Signpost this week has a link labeled WikiWorld: "Disruptive technology" (as last week), but the cartoon itself is entitled WikiWorld: "World domination". JRSpriggs (talk) 16:54, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Someone fixed this problem. Thanks. JRSpriggs (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Recent OFFICE action

Hi, Ral315.

Please consider this official confirmation of today's office action. Cary Bass (talk) 00:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Overtime (ice hockey)

I left an explanation on the talk page of Overtime (ice hockey). Essentially, we just need to wait until the game is finished before adding it to the list. Anything before is just a waste of time, and rather unencyclopedic. Kaiser matias (talk) 06:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

While I agree I am expalaining it poorly, but it is used, from what I can determine, across the various sports projects. It's a game in progess, and it doesn't need to be updated until completed. A similar problem happened back in the 2006 World Cup of Football/Soccer, to use an example, and the consensus was not to update any matches until after they were completed. I would look up some more official explanation, but I'd rather watch the game, and it is rather late out. Kaiser matias (talk) 06:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Why would you NOT grant rollback to me. I asked another administrator, and he said he couldn't, even though I do not fully understand why. Why would you NOT grant rollback to me. I am not saying that you personally didn't, I am saying that if I did ask you, and you said no, what would your reasons be? --Obaidz96 (talk • contribs • count) 00:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

RfB comments and response

Hi, Ral. I have responded to your concern on the page. I believe that I was guilty of not explaining enough (which is humorous, when you look at the length of my posts) but the EXACT same problem with the EXACT same discussion (these percentages) occurred last week, so you think I should have learned, eh? :}. In any event, I'd appreciate if you looked at my response and the link to the discussion on WT:RFA brought there, perhaps it would ease your specific concern. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 11:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

You have e-mail, Ral. -- Avi (talk) 21:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

MAOR KATZ!

This page needs more KATZ! Raul654 (talk) 15:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Your bot deleted my talk page

It appears that your bot deleted my talk page. I'm going to assume that it is just a bug, but on the off-chance that your bot has become self-aware, I thought I would report it. Cheers. —BradV 03:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Dispatch

Strong protest at your removal of two images in the featured content section. The article was significantly more attractive with them. Why was the picture of the pencil sharpener used in last week's dispatch, then?

I'm going to lose interest in authoring further material. Tony (talk) 10:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I'd like to have known beforehand that admissability of (even Commons) images was going to be an issue, since it took quite a while to locate suitable ones, to write captions and to integrate them into the text. I don't think three images in such a substantial text is clutter. The middle one (of high-school children using computers) is the least beneficial, IMO, but even then, it balances the university-weighted approach in the text with possibility that younger students might be included. The top image is beautiful, and has never been used anywhere. I believe that it makes a plain read more attractive. It is directly relevant to the topic, although not strictly necessary; however, the caption gave the chance to drive home an important point in a short, punchy way. Tony (talk) 17:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Rfb participation thanks

Hello, Ral.

I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. As you felt the need to oppose my candidacy, I would appreciate any particular thoughts or advice you may have as to what flaws in my candidacy you perceived and how you feel they may be addressed, especially as you said theer were other issues besides the (improper) analogy using the incomplete beta function :). Once again, thank you for your participation. -- Avi (talk) 20:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Coverage that came out after the Wikinews article was published

FYI, you may want to check this out as related to the Copyright claim piece, all these sources came out after the Wikinews article was published:

• Moore, Carrie A. (2008-05-14). "Was LDS handbook posted illegally?". Deseret News. Retrieved 2008-05-15.
• Moore, Carrie A. (2008-05-14). "LDS Church alleges Wikimedia site infringed copyright". Deseret News. Retrieved 2008-05-14.
• "Another Scientology-like Web war? Mormon Church documents put online". Web Scout. Los Angeles Times. 2008-05-14. Retrieved 2008-05-14.
• Carricaburu, Lisa (2008-05-14). "LDS Church alleges Web site violated its copyright". The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved 2008-05-14.
• Mick, Jason (2008-05-14). "Mormon Church Attacks Wikileaks". DailyTech. Retrieved 2008-05-14.
• "Mormons The Latest To Make Their Secret Documents More Popular By Trying To Take Them Down". Techdirt. 2008-05-14. Retrieved 2008-05-14.
• Warchol, Glen (2008-05-14). "Wikitrouble". Salt Lake Crawler. The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved 2008-05-14.
• Anderson, Nate (2008-05-14). "Mormons, Scientologists face uphill battle against Wikileaks". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2008-05-14.
• "Mormon Church Goes After WikiLeaks". Slashdot. 2008-05-14. Retrieved 2008-05-14.

Hit the front-page of Slashdot, and still is on front-page, as of 23:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, Cirt (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost duplicate

FYI, Ralbot ran the signpost delivery twice today. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 10:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-05-12/Copyright claim

Hi there. Since I've made a big deal of this over on Wikinews, it is only makes sense that I should inform you of my concerns with this article here. Part of the article, in particular the paragraph starting "On May 5", uses information obtained from a confidential OTRS ticket which has been made public by an OTRS volunteer in violation of OTRS rules. As such I've suggested that this paragraph be removed from the Wikinews article and now make that same suggestion here. It is inappropriate that we should be including such information as to do so would be to condone the violation of OTRS rules. I would therefore ask you consider removing this paragraph from the Signpost article. Regards. Adambro (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Next time ask for a shovel and I'll gladly provide one. You don't have to dig with your hands. --Brian McNeil /^talk 18:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost coverage for an event

I'm preparing to run a big competition to start in a couple of months. It will focus on the development of over 200 drafts, to be transferred to article space when completed.

It would be ideal to have the competition covered in the Signpost, including an announcement of the contest before it starts, reporting of monthly winners and the current champion, effectiveness of the collaboration, overall impact, etc.

Though I don't know what to expect of the Signpost, or what the proper procedures or requirements are to get an event like this covered, etc. So I'm contacting you in advance to find out.

Any information or direction you could provide would be most appreciated.

Sincerely,

The Transhumanist 03:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-05-12/Board elections

To let you know I updated the article as it was incorrectly stating the election is for a two-year term rather than the one due to the Board restructuring. Regards. -- KTC (talk) 06:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Curious (cross-namespace redirect)

I'm just curious - not that I particular care or want to see the redirect deleted - but isn't WP:WTHN a cross-namespace redirect? Shouldn't the essay be moved into the WP space or some such (WTHN, after all? ;>)? cheers, xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 16:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Hows this for a crazy coincidence? . Just thought I should let you know these types of redirects are being discussed. xenocidic (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

My Recent Rfa

Although you opposed me in my recent RFA I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me I have made a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

my RfA - Ta!

Gwen gleans, wending keen by the wikirindle.

Thanks for supporting my RfA, which went through 93/12/5. I'll be steadfast in this trust the en.Wikipedia community has given me. Cheers! Gwen Gale (talk) 01:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

26 May Dispatch

Hi Ral

The draft is complete; wouldn't mind feedback from a few folks when they wake up, but it's in reasonable shape already, I think.

Two issues: (1) There are four pics, all of them illustrating different categories of featured sound, directly related to actual FSs. Is this too many? They seem to align neatly, and we want to give readers a sense of the possibilities (frankly, FSC needs a boost and has significant potential). (2) Zginter put himself down as co-author at an earlier stage, but really, there's little text by him. I think the acknowledgement at the bottom is better, if anything at all. (No big deal, though—I'd rather go back to co-authors if there's any problem.) TONY (talk) 07:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Ral, I don't know what happened here at all. The ball was completely dropped this week because I'm traveling, and Tony kindly scrambled to pick up the ball and write an article in a day. I have limited internet access, but there's a problem now: there are two versions, WP:FCDW/May 26, 2008, where the article should be since the Signpost hasn't yet been published, and another article at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-05-26/Dispatches. Perhaps Tony created the Signpost version with a cut-and-paste, rather than waiting for you to move it, and in the meantime another editor continued to edit the temp version. Don't know how to fix it, I don't have admin tools, or I'd move everything to the right place and figure it out. Sorry, must frustrated :/ SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Never mind; Gimmetrow sorted everything, merged the histories, deleted the duplicate. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

H20's RfA

Hey Ral,

Just out of curiosity, did you notice that water addressed your question in question 3 or were you looking for something more?Balloonman (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Ral, I'm happy to say more about that subject if you need clarification - I didn't say everything I could have for the sake of brevity. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Oops, missed that reply. Feel free to ask whenever. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)