Morgoonki

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LongLivePortugal (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LongLivePortugal (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the support (NATO/Russia articles)

I have to admit that sometimes you just think about letting it go, but seeing I'm not alone or crazy gives you hope. For me it's amazing that providing an original source of a declassified U.S. memorandum, some of my edits just are repeteadly reverted (the NATO article is very biased, and also the intentation of erasing a well-sourced article, instead of reaching a consensus on the name, if the woerd 'pact' is a problem). Obviously, the way some editors see the world affects there editing. I'm pretty understand that some editors (LongLivePortugal) support NATO (as their userpage clearly states), for instance, or condemn Russian's actions, but they can do so without erasing or denaying historial and objective facts. Jasandia (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2022 (CET)

Second complaint of edit warring at NATO

Please see WP:AN3#User:Morgoonki reported by User:LongLivePortugal, second complaint (Result: ). You seem to have broken the WP:3RR. There might still be time for you to avoid a block if you reply and promise to stop reverting. EdJohnston (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Jasandia. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 23:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for NATO

NATO has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)