User talk:Miminity/Archives/4

Seth Eisenberg Page

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for your review of this page. I'm in the process of adding references and would appreciate your feedback. MerlinsMagic (talk) 13:04, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Clarifications and Request for Further Information Regarding Feedback on the Article

Latest comment: 3 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Article Draft:Thierry Rayer

Dear Moderators,

I am writing to seek your assistance regarding the feedback you provided on the article in question. First, I would like to thank you for your comments and for the work you do to maintain the platform’s quality standards.

However, I am somewhat surprised by some of your remarks, particularly those indicating that certain phrases appear too promotional. Our intention is simply to faithfully transcribe information from media outlets and official sources, such as ministries or museums. I would therefore like to raise a few points to clarify the situation.

Firstly, could you please identify the specific phrases or information that you find promotional? This would help us make the necessary adjustments while remaining faithful to the sources we have carefully selected. It is crucial not to alter the content of information from official or journalistic sources, as this might compromise its accuracy.

Secondly, I would like to emphasize that all references cited in the article come from reliable, recognized, and verifiable sources. The excerpts written are directly based on these sources to ensure accuracy and compliance. It would be helpful if you could review these references in detail, as they form the foundation of the article and ensure the reliability of the presented information.

I therefore wonder how these sources are being taken into account during the evaluation process. Have you had the opportunity to review them thoroughly? By doing so, you will see that the article is solely based on factual and verified information, drawn from credible and objective publications.

Our goal is to contribute in a neutral, objective, and well-documented manner. We would be very grateful if you could guide us on the necessary adjustments to meet your expectations while maintaining the integrity of the sources.

Thank you for your attention, and I remain at your disposal for any further clarification.

Sincerely, Inspiringflow (talk) 12:09, 8 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Inspiringflow: Please read the comment my fellow editor left on the draft.

Also please stop using AI to write your reason. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 01:35, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello How are you ?

Regarding this feedback,

I took them into account and I have just made a complete modification to all of the article. please consult it again in order to enlighten me more on what remains to be done,

Speaking of the sources he spoke about, I would like to emphasize the fact that these are reliable sources that I use and I would never use corrupt or manipulate sources,

with all my respect for your work, please consult the article again in order to give me feedback if there are any possible corrections to be made to the article

Thank you very much Inspiringflow (talk) 12:40, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/db/Thierry_Rayer_Awards.jpg/220px-Thierry_Rayer_Awards.jpg

Additionally,

please see this photo I don't put corrupt sources, if you say or insist that I put corrupt sources then you would mean by that that even the people in the photo are corrupt?

be very careful with your words, I did not put this photo for nothing, it is to further strengthen the credibility of my statements, and you will clearly see in these photos that the people present are senior executives,

this photo also brings together all of my conferences which took place in the United Arab Emirates and elsewhere, I work in humanitarian work and if it was for other reasons, I would have put photos everywhere.

I strongly insist that these sources are very reliable.

So review your feedback THANKS Inspiringflow (talk) 13:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I would like to emphasize once again that my writing style aligns with UNESCO's principles, and it is solely within this context that I write my articles. UNESCO only speaks of peace and well-being, and there is nothing promotional about my statements. I do not promote any individual or anyone else. Everything I talk about here concerns the works I have accomplished, all the actions I have undertaken. I work in humanitarian aid, and I address the same topics as UNESCO. I give conferences with senior and influential officials, in Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, as I mentioned earlier. Everything I say is verifiable with the extremely reliable sources I have included in the article.

I go to Geneva to give conferences at the UN, etc.

There is also the Minister of Culture.

Look at all the photos I have posted of myself with princesses, with ministers, even with the most famous Minister of Culture. There are ambassadors from Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, everyone is there. Despite this, you claim that I pay journalists, that the sources I provide are not reliable at all. Are you serious?

Please be very careful with your words. Verify the sources properly, take the time to thoroughly check each piece of information before making defamatory accusations against me. If you say all of this, are you insinuating that all these high-ranking officials are corrupt? That they are fake?

After all the sources, references, photos, etc., that I provide, you dare to say they are false?

I invite you to thoroughly verify the information in my article, the sources, the references, etc., before saying anything.

And when you say that I paid someone to publish the article, are you serious? The person in the article’s photo is the director of the Louvre Abu Dhabi museum, not just anyone.

So, be very careful with what you say. Are you insinuating that an influential person would have paid a journalist to publish an article? These are defamatory statements you are making.

I do volunteer work, humanitarian work. I go to Africa to help poor children, disadvantaged families, and others. I work in humanitarian aid and help them access a good education, etc.

I have even risked my life several times doing humanitarian work. Tell me, what interest do I have in doing it? Other than constantly risking my life trying to make a difference for the less fortunate?

What you’re saying doesn’t make sense. So, reconsider your statements. Inspiringflow (talk) 14:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Improvement on the article

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please can you let me know what are the mistakes this article Acharya Rajkumar Pandey has. Autobotai (talk) 09:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Autobotai:

The tone sounds like you are promoting the person (e.g. a renowned Vedic astrologer and spiritual guide, known for his expertise in astrology, numerology, Vaastu, and Tarot card reading. Note that this is only one the entire "Career and Expertise" was full of WP:PEACOCK words.
Need more secondary sources to verify the claims for his "his expertise in astrology, numerology, Vaastu, and Tarot card reading." as it currently regards as WP:FRINGETHEORY. (Note: Astrology is considered as a pseudoscience.)
Google News, provides no sources him. Only WP:PASSINGMENTION.

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 09:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply