Welcome!

Hello, John2o2o2o, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 11:43, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Elisabeth Heath-Sladen

edit

The name is sourced to her autobiography. If you don't have sources that contradict this, the name will stay. Jarkeld (talk) 10:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Soapboxing

edit

Whilst I may not wholly agree with the PA's against yuo you are doing yourself no favours. Please read wp:notaforum as well as WP:verify and wp:rs.Slatersteven (talk) 17:27, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talk:InfoWars

edit

Hey, I'm posting this here to let you know that your editing there is the exact sort of editing that I've seen editors get blocked or topic banned over, many, many times. You are free to believe what you like, but arguing without reference to policy from your own perspectives, and tossing around terms like "zionism" and complaining about the habits of "liberals" is going to reflect very poorly upon you if an editor asks for a topic ban. I would strongly advise you to stop. You've said your piece, now let it go. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Where did he vote twice?Slatersteven (talk) 17:38, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Here. I reverted that edit. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:42, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Where is his first vote?Slatersteven (talk) 10:10, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
First vote is here, second vote is here - two votes in the same discussion. Girth Summit (talk) 10:37, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Cheers, for some reason I could not find one of them (I must hve been clocking on another of his edits).Slatersteven (talk) 10:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Simonm223 (talk) 19:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jimmy Wales

edit

Please note that noone on WP is a mouthpiece for him: we only should care about what reliable sources say. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate23:08, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talk-page conduct

edit

As you may have noticed, your editing was recently discussed at ANI and, as has happened before, concerns were expressed about your:

  • Treating article talkpages as forum and soapbox
  • Frequent, and often unjustified, complaints about harassment, when users respond/object to that

This needs to stop else you are looking at an indefinite block from wikipedia the next time conduct of the above sort is repeated. I'd also second the recommendation made at the ANI thread that you consider getting a mentor so that you can contribute more productively, and avoid the mental-stress you appear to have experienced here in the past. Abecedare (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Now, apparently, you have chosen to continue: [1]. Hereby I warn you that the next instance of talk page soapboxing may result in a block of your account.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Important Notice

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:59, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edit war

edit

Carefully read wp:editwar, 3RR is not a right, and even if you do not break it you can still be edit warring if you keep on making the same changes.11:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is John2o2o2o. Thank you. Kleinpecan (talk) 06:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Abecedare (talk) 21:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have noticed your block and barely remembered you, but now do after reading this talk page. Here is a tip that may be useful if you would like to legitimately edit: if there are non-controversial topics (or where you are less invested in) that you would like to edit, you could specify in an unblock request what, and agree to a voluntary topic ban from American politics and climate change. I suspect that the indefinite block was because your editing history indicated that you were only editing for activism (WP:NOTHERE, WP:RGW). It's never too late to change that if you have other interests... Finally I advise against evading the block with other accounts or addresses, as it'd make it harder to legitimately edit again when caught and any contributions would be reverted (i.e. WP:BE, WP:STANDARDOFFER). Farewell for now, —PaleoNeonate18:24, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

UTRS 52181

edit