Franklin.vp

Hello, Franklin.vp and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! DoubleBlue (talk) 20:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Question

{{help}}

I have a question: What is the copyright status of deleted images? Can someone point me to some wiki-page talking about this. Are deleted files completely deleted from the servers? What is the policy about that?

The copyright status of an image doesn't change when it is deleted from Wikipedia. If an image is free before it is deleted, it is free after it is deleted. If it is copyrighted before it is deleted from Wikipedia, it is copyrighted after is deleted. The copyright status of a deleted image doesn't matter anyway to Wikipedia because it cannot be used on Wikipedia.

To answer your second question, files that are deleted are not completely deleted from the servers. Any file (or any page) can be undeleted by an administrator.

The policy on deletion can be read at Wikipedia:Deletion policy, and requests to undelete a file or page are made at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao ^talk 19:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Food Photography

I remove your image from Food Photography again. You do it again I'll come round your house and shoot you in the kneecaps. Score Deal Gun (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Niagara Falls Pictures

The article Niagara Falls Pictures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not an image repository.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 02:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Franklin.vp, please note that the Niagara Falls article already links to the image gallery on Wikimedia Commons. Feel free to add to this gallery if you want to provide further images of Niagara Falls. Thank you. ∙ AJCham talk 04:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Source info on pics

Hi again Franklin.vp, I notice that the images you uploaded have no 'Source' data. I don't doubt that you created the images (the metadata indicates they were all taken by the same camera), but you should add some short text: "Own work by uploader" or similar as the source. I'd also like to congratulate you on some great shots - love the CN tower pics. Furthermore, I think you should consider placing the images on Commons, as more people can benefit that way. Regards, ∙ AJCham talk 17:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Korda

What's about that "Korda Chicken" picture? --Damiens.rf 20:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

File:PlatanoBulva.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PlatanoBulva.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Sandstein  15:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

File:KordaChicken.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:KordaChicken.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 02:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Donkey punch

It seems to me that your concerns about the illustration would be better addressed by producing a better illustration. I think the image surely adds to the reader's understanding of the subject of the article, even if the article is more detailed. If you disagree, and it appears you do, I recommend you start a discussion at the article's talk page instead of simply removing the image. --Maxamegalon2000 04:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

File:ConceptualphotoAnorexia.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:ConceptualphotoAnorexia.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 03:19, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

—SpaceFlight89 03:19, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

FPC Voting

Hi Franklin. When voting at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates could you please ensure you include a bullet point before your vote. This is an FPC convention which you will notice all others follow, but you never do so. This is easy to do - simply add an asterisk * before your vote and it shows as a bullet. Thanks, --jjron (talk) 15:12, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:NiagaraFallsShoeHorse.jpg

File:NiagaraFallsShoeHorse.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:NiagaraFallsShoeHorse.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:NiagaraFallsShoeHorse.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

File:CNTowerLong.jpg is now available as Commons:File:CNTowerLong.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

File:PlatanoVulva.jpg is now available as Commons:File:PlatanoVulva.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:22, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Re: ATTACK

I am going to assume here that you did not mean to attack me. I am going to assume this because I blatantly declared that I respond poorly to that type of thing. That being said, never post on my user talk again. I do not value your opinions, and do not wish to hear you speak, as it is clear that your understanding of what I am doing at FPC is near nonexistent. I have removed your comments. Goodbye.  Nezzadar [SPEAK]  03:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Here.

Hello, Franklin.vp. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hint

Please stop the constant intimidation at Nezzadar's talk page. They are serving nothing but to turn the situation inflammatory. You've stated your point several times and Nezzadar clearly doesn't want you near him. Take a step back so things can get better. ZooFari^Boo! 07:28, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Sanctions

Franklin, I'm going to level with you. You've been extremely incivil towards Nazzadar. Now, civility is a cornerstone of Wikipedia, this being a collaborative project. But you seem to be suffering from a chronic lack of AGF towards this user. I read his comments myself that seemed to have sparked this, and from my years of experience, there's nothing in there of concern. However, the way you carried your dispute to Nazzadar's talk page has been completely inappropriate. But since you're a newbie, I'll assume good faith instead of blocking you outright.

Here's my deal with you, and I'm going to post this to the relevant section on ANI. Stay away from Nazzadar. Don't post to his talk page. Stay away from him in discussion. Be civil. If you can follow this, you won't be blocked. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

You can see the discussion at Wikipedia:ANI#Personal_attacks_by_User:Franklin.vp. For Nazzadar's part, he has voluntarily committed to be less controversial at FPC. As for his own edits, like I said, I looked through them and didn't see anything troubling. If you would like for me to comment on something specific, please link to a diff. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

• A little time shows where the truth was. Maybe in the causes of this interesting phenomenon?  franklin 

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Withdraws on PPR

For future reference, at Peer Picture Review, things are rather informal. I don't think there is a withdraw process, you just cut out the nomination from PPR and paste it in the archives, in this case Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Archives/Oct-Dec 2009. I did it for you :). Also, if the version ZooFari helped you with is good, feel free to nominate it to FP or VP. If it isn't perfect, I suggest VP, and when it is perfect, you can then nominate it to FP, which is common enough. Note that FP is higher than VP and no image can be both, so a promoved VP loses VP when it becomes an FP. Either way, if you get it out there, it will be seen by more people and put in more pages. Enjoy, Nezzadar ^[SPEAK] 05:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Logging in

Something is happening. I can log in but then when I move around to either see my watch list or any other option it says I am not logged in. Is there a problem with Wikipedia? Franklin.vp  14:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

OK, it seems to be solved. Franklin.vp  14:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Normal crossings

Looks like you figured out the redirect system - I ended up redirecting the other article titles you had mentioned; let me know if I screwed any of them up, or if I can be of further assistance. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Too many capital letters

Hello. Please note that per WP:MOS, a section heading should not say Normal Crossing Divisors, but rather Normal crossing divisors. See my recent edits to that article. The first letter of a heading is normally capitalized; later letters are capitalized only if, for example, they are initial letters of someone's name, or there is otherwise a special reason to capitalize them. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

• Oh, thank you for fixing that.  Franklin.vp  01:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Re Japan photos of people

Replied on my talkpage. --jjron (talk) 13:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Anthony E. Sowell.jpg

The source you provided [3] is dead and the main page [4] doesn't have any note of (c). Some of these can be uploaded as {{Non-free mugshot}} - you just need to determine if the criteria in that template match the restrictions by the creating agency.  Skier Dude  ►  00:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

It's been restored with the correct license - you'll have to fill in the "Fair use Rationale" on the image description page (I put the basic template there) and also restore the image to the article in question.  Skier Dude  ►  00:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

As the uploader you have to give a description (i.e. mug shot) - what article its going to placed on - purpose (i.e. reason its on the article) - replaceable (if it's been used on the article to describe the arrest, state something like that). The other fields are already filled in.  Skier Dude  ►  00:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

ANI archive

Heya, just as a heads-up, your comment here was (probably inadvertently) placed on an archive page.[5] So if you want someone to actually see it, it probably needs to go elsewhere... FYI, --Elonka 03:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Hyphen ≠ endash

Why isn't this article appearing when I search for "Hilbert-Samuel function" or "Hilbert Samuel function"?

Because the article's title uses an endash whereas you used a hyphen. I've created a new redirect page whose title has a hyphen, redirecting to the article whose title has an endash.

Wikipedia's style conventions prescribe an endash for this sort of thing, but whenever you create a new article, it's a good idea to create redirect pages with alternative spellings, alternative capitalizations, and commonplace misspellings, misnomers, alternative names, etc. Then when people search for the page, or link to the page, using one of those other names, they won't find themselves in the situation that happened to you. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

...OK, I'm looking at the edit history. It seems you must have created the article by following a link from another article, and the link had an endash, but you may have failed to notice that it was not a hyphen. Michael Hardy (talk) 03:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Quantum time

When an article, such as this one, is officially flagges as a possible copyright violation, and the flag specifically says that the article should not be edited until it has been reviewed by an admin, then it means exactly that. Please do not remove copyvio tags. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 11:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Rewriting copyright concerns

Hi. I very much appreciate your efforts to help with rewriting this article. As the template covering it says, though, rewriting should be done from scratch in the linked temporary space. This is to avoid creating an unauthorized derivative work. Also, I'm afraid that overwriting copyright violations in the manner that you attempted here can be much more difficult, because with sentence by sentence revision, it is hard to escape the existing language and structure of a source, both of which are protected by United States' copyright laws. Compare, for instance, the following material from the source:

Extended content

The Planck length is the scale at which classical ideas about gravity and space-time cease to be valid, and quantum effects dominate. This is the ‘quantum of length’, the smallest measurement of length with any meaning. And roughly equal to 1.6 x 10-35 m or about 10-20 times the size of a proton. The Planck time is the time it would take a photon travelling at the speed of light to across a distance equal to the Planck length. This is the ‘quantum of time’, the smallest measurement of time that has any meaning, and is equal to 10-43 seconds. No smaller division of time has any meaning. As it has stood, the Wikipedia article has said: The Planck length is the scale at which classical ideas about gravity and spacetime cease to be valid, and quantum effects dominate. This is the quantum of length or space, the smallest measurement of length with any meaning which is about to 1.6 x 10-35 m. The Planck time is the time it would take a photon at the speed of light to travel a distance equal to the Planck length. This is the quantum of time.... No smaller division of time has any apparent meaning. Your revision changes some of the language, but none of the structure and retains the overall feel of the original piece, where it said: The Planck length is the quantum of length or space, is the scale at which classical notions about gravity and spacetime cease to be valid, and quantum effects dominate. It is the smallest measurement of length theoretically available and set to be about 1.6 x 10-35 m. The Planck time can be defined as the time it would take a photon at the speed of light to travel the distance equal to the Planck length. ....Smaller divisions of time have no any apparent meaning.

The facts, of course, are not copyrighted, but any rewrite that retains enough of the feel of the original that copying seems obvious stands a risk of rising to the level of substantial similarity in a US court of law. In this case, copying is obvious because much of the language remains the same and the order of material is largely retained.

The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

More than the material identified will need to be rewritten. Given the history of this contributor, it is very likely as well that additional sources have been infringed upon in this article. It will need to be deleted. The purpose of blanking it is to allow contributors familiar with this area an opportunity to write a completely new article before it is. The new article should, again, be written in the temporary space that is now linked from the article's front. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:20, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Smile

Hello Franklin.vp, Sławomir Biały has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

This post obviously crosses a line it should not have. I was about to write something nasty in reply, but as I clicked "Save", my internet connection suddenly crashed. Now that I have had time to reflect on it, I find that there is very little to be gained in getting upset over such things. Happy editing, and I hope that our future encounters are marked with a greater spirit of cooperation, and less one of mutual antagonism. Best, Sławomir Biały (talk) 21:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Regarding recent behavior

I have started a thread at the administrators noticeboard: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Unacceptable behavior from User:Franklin.vp. Sławomir Biały (talk) 16:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Functorial resolution of singularities

Hi Franklin,

In which "file page" do you see the error? I can't reproduce it. If you mean when you click on the svg link and your browser opens the file, that's probably because your browser renders the file differently from the way Wikipedia does. If you want a preview of the Wikipedia rendering on your computer, you can use librsvg. --Slashme (talk) 21:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

It happens for some reason in the image page [6]. When I click to see the image it is rendered fine in my browser and also in the article resolution of singularities is fine. Don't worry too much about it, since it looks fine in the important places.  franklin  21:56, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Strange indeed! It looks OK to me. What browser are you using? --Slashme (talk) 20:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

• Firefox 3.5.6 Still happening now. I checked now IE vertion 8.4  franklin  21:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, colour me clueless! --Slashme (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

You have a message

Hello, Franklin.vp. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 franklin 

{{help}} How can I avoid the index of a page to be created? The index that have the list of all the sections of the page.  franklin  01:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

___NOTOC___  fetchcomms☛ 01:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

polynomial

Let's discuss this on the talk page of "polynomial", where everyone can see. Rick Norwood (talk) 14:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ti-tree_sprig3.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ti-tree_sprig3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ti-tree_sprig_with_fingers_removed.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ti-tree_sprig_with_fingers_removed.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 15:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Franklin.vp. You have new messages at Pontificalibus's talk page.
Message added 08:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Pontificalibus (talk) 08:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Picture: CN Tower

An image created by you has been promoted to valued picture status Your image, File:CNTowerNastyFall.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Elekhh (talk) 20:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Economy.

Rv of wrong edit? -- Jeandré (talk), 2010-02-10t18:26z

• Lapsus mentis. I thought I was reverting precisely that. Seems to be that I looked to the wrong column in the diff page.  franklin  18:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Curiosity

Hi Franklin. You're of course entitled to whatever sort of anonymity you please, but I was just curious.. Every now and then you say something that makes me think that English isn't your first language. I just thought it might help me understand where you're coming from at times if we knew where you are from, etc. :-) No offense intended. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 11:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

• Indeed, it is not. My first language is Spanish. (but what happened with that post in the FPC talk page happens to me also in Spanish. I read too fast and, of course, sometimes mistakes occur. In this case I skipped a "was".)  franklin  11:45, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Fair enough. Actually, the thing that prompted me to ask was when you said "Has this picture Featured status?". The most common way to say this would be "Does this picture have featured status?" or if you want to start with the word 'has', it would be "Has this picture got featured status?". Anyway, sorry, I didn't mean to turn this into an English lesson, and we all make mistakes when rushing. :-) Ðiliff «» (Talk) 12:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

• Oh, no. Very useful! I didn't know what you said. Lessons of any sort are welcomed anytime. Thanks. My main purpose in editing Wikipedia is that from time to time I learn new things.  franklin  12:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File:BurnedAlot.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BurnedAlot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:07, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Edit1burnedAlot.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edit1burnedAlot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:07, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Edit2burnedAlot.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edit2burnedAlot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

File:CramerRuleGeometricInterpretation.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CramerRuleGeometricInterpretation.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 18:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Beaver Dam promoted as VP

An image created by you has been promoted to valued picture status Your image, File:AlgonquinBeaverDam.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Elekhh (talk) 01:57, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

VPC

— raekyT 10:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: José María López Lledín

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as José María López Lledín, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.cubagenweb.org/misc/paris.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:José María López Lledín and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, José María López Lledín, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:José María López Lledín. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:José María López Lledín with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:José María López Lledín saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Gab4gab (talk) 21:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anthony E. Sowell.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anthony E. Sowell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:InvitationFPCforTalkPages

Template:InvitationFPCforTalkPages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2023 (UTC)