Elcid.ruderico

Elcid.ruderico, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Elcid.ruderico! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello Elcid.ruderico, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
• Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
• Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

• Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Elcid.ruderico, good luck, and have fun. --Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Editing issues

Hi Elcid.ruderic -- I've recently had to clean up several of your edits to 2011 St. Louis Cardinals season article, while another veteran editor had to do the same to the main St. Louis Cardinals article. Please take some time to study the Wikipedia manual of style and articles on other baseball teams. A couple things in particular: the information you included about the AL teams also mounting comebacks (Tampa Bay, Boston, etc) was not relevant to the 2011 St. Louis Cardinals article so I've removed that info. It more properly belonged in the articles for those teams. Please also make sure to include some sort of edit summary briefly describing what changes you've made to the articles and possibly why. Also, just a helpful hint for both you and in courtesy to others: instead of making a large number of small edits, saving your work each time, try doing multiple edits and then saving. It makes it much less cluttered on the articles history page and helps other editors/administrators better understand whats going on rather than the tedious task of checking each individual edit one by one. Much thanks! Sector001 (talk) 22:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

St. Louis Cardinals page/pages/portal

I've been helping with effort on the St. Louis Cardinals page, its history pages, and others pertaining to it. I'm working to get the main SLC page and the history pages to receive promotion to featured article status, as well any other significant page pertaining. I am relatively new to editing/contributing on Wikipedia, and am open to input, so if anyone has any I would definitely like to hear it. ˜˜˜˜Elcid.ruderico, 18 April 2013

List of St. Louis Cardinals managers

I love the what you did to the lead of the article! If you just cite your sources, you should be set to nominate that list as a featured list candidate! ;). Just make sure to include User:LAAFan as a nominator as well, because I like to know that credits are given to where credits are due, as LAAFan did an excellent job developing that article! :D I'm retired from Wikipedia now, so please reply on my page or at least give me a notice that you have replied! --K.Annoyomous (talk) 10:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

WP:FAC review

I just saw your Yadier Molina nomination. It is one of the few sports nominees in the queue. As a sports fan, I was hoping you would consider reviewing Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/archive1, which after 4 weeks still seems to have a modest amount of feedback.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the St. Louis Cardinals (1990–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northwestern (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Michael Wacha

You've done good work on Wacha's article. I created it, but you're contributions to the article are greater than mine. I think the article is ready for WP:GAN. Would you like to take the lead on it? I have several other GANs in the queue. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Michael Wacha

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Michael Wacha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Elcid.ruderico. You have new messages at Muboshgu's talk page.
Message added 12:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

– Muboshgu (talk) 12:04, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Michael Wacha

The article Michael Wacha you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Michael Wacha for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Michael Wacha to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Is this your first GA? If so, double congratulations. I hope it'll be the first of many--there's a whole lot of Cardinals out there! -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Michael Wacha

The article Michael Wacha you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Michael Wacha for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/archive1

Did you forget about Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/archive1? You have not commented in four days.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I have responded to your last concern.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:17, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Yadier Molina

Hey Elcid, you've probably noticed already, but I wanted to give you a formal notification that I've opened a GA review at Yadier Molina and put it on hold for a few initial issues to be addressed. Looking forward to working with you on it, assuming you're interested. On an unrelated note, how do you feel about the Freese trade? -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Yadier Molina to Good Article status, your patience with a lengthy review, and most of all for your hard work on my favorite Cardinal's article. Thanks for all you do, Khazar2 (talk) 12:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Allen Craig

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Allen Craig you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 20:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Allen Craig

The article Allen Craig you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Allen Craig for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Allen Craig

The article Allen Craig you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Allen Craig for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 02:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trey Burke/archive1

Since you were a discussant at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/archive1 and 2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team overlaps with the article for its star player Trey Burke, I hope you might be willing comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Trey Burke/archive1, which has been open 19 days without any substantive commentary.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Louis Cardinals award winners and league leaders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commissioner's Trophy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of St. Louis Cardinals team records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bobby Byrne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jason Heyward

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jason Heyward you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EricEnfermero -- EricEnfermero (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 St. Louis Cardinals season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Cooney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Jason Heyward

Elcid -

Just a heads up that I finally finished the GA review feedback on this article. I just wanted to make sure that you saw it. I apologize for the lapse and I will try to remain attentive to any changes that you make so that we can work toward GA status as soon as possible. I have identified a few more issues for you to address, but I think we are getting there. EricEnfermero (Talk) 14:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jason Heyward

The article Jason Heyward you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jason Heyward for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of EricEnfermero -- EricEnfermero (talk) 03:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 29 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Jason Heyward page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 St. Louis Cardinals season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Cooney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greg Maddux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1998 Houston Astros season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derek Bell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

"See alsos"

I think you are adding too many articles to the see also sections and causing a little bit too much clutter. Stan Musial for example has too many. Some of these articles are already linked numerous times throughout the article and in the infobox and templates at the bottom. Things such as the St. Louis Cardinals all-time roster seems unnecessary. In fact I believe that there was a discussion in the past to not include these in articles though I can't seem to find it. What do you think?--Yankees10 02:03, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, as always, Yankees10 for pointing this out, and your helpfulness in streamlining Wikipedia articles. I was unaware of this being an issue, but for future reference, I will be more judicious before adding of links within the See also sections. Elcid.ruderico (talk) 13:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alberto Rosario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominicans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aledmys Díaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Villanueva. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeff Bagwell

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jeff Bagwell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 19:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeff Bagwell

The article Jeff Bagwell you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jeff Bagwell for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 15:20, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jeff Bagwell

The article Jeff Bagwell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jeff Bagwell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 23:41, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

David Ortiz page

Dude, if you're gonna change the whole heading of the page (which in my opinion is totally unnecessary) then you need to fix the grammar in all those sentences. It's horrible.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Elcid.ruderico. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Elcid.ruderico. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Randy Flores, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Texas Rangers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Nolan Arenado

Hey, how come Nolan Arenado isn't a GA yet? – Muboshgu (talk) 03:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

• Ok Señor Mubo. Thanks for the encouragement. But I ask, even though this a late reply please apply the wrecking ball with velvet! LOL. Elcid.ruderico (talk) 02:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Select Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_0PqcO38YpnPXTRX&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 12:37, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nolan Arenado

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nolan Arenado you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 00:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nolan Arenado

The article Nolan Arenado you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nolan Arenado for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your Disapperance / Nolan Arenado GAN

Hello @Elcid.ruderico: I noticed you seem to have disappeared from Wikipedia. Are you planning on coming back (specifically to reply to the Nolan Arenado GA review)? Thanks! Sportsfan77777 (talk) 19:41, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nolan Arenado

The article Nolan Arenado you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nolan Arenado for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 04:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Elcid.ruderico. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited José Ramírez (infielder), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José Abreu. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)