May 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Domo (NHK), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 14:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

What point were you trying to prove anyway? -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 21:33, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Students of mine regarded Wikipedia as invalid because of nonsense misinformation that can sometimes appear there; and I made the point that usually when someone does that, those watching over the page fix it within minutes. We chose that page because one student had a Domo wallet. =) Chaosthethird (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have a Domo wallet also. Maybe I've started a trend. :)
If the page gets vandalized often enough it can be semi-protected. However, the Domo page isn't quite there yet. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 23:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

October 2011

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Heroin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Just to show your student the full ramifications ;) Writ Keeper (talk) 15:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Chaosthethird, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dan56 (talk) 08:32, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2012

edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album Pt. 1, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 08:32, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wilson Goode

edit

Hi. You may be unfamiliar with our policy on edit warring. Please familiarize yourself with the policy warning below and take it seriously. Removing factual descriptions of actions such as assaulting neighbors and parading with loudspeakers that are part of the public record as "POV" is not appropriate, and replacing it with laudatory language will not be seen as neutral. Please address any concerns you have about neutrality on the article's talk page. If you revert this material again it will be reported for administrative action with no further warning. μηδείς (talk) 04:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit warring warning Wilson Goode

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilson Goode, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C-4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 22 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply