User talk:Absconded Northerner/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Absconded Northerner. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome!
|
- Wow. I feel so... welcome, after having received such a personalised template. Absconded Northerner (talk) 01:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Tomic discussion
Hello, just a note to let you know that there is a discussion at Talk:Bernard Tomic#Let's settle this, which you may be interested in participating in. Also, can I please apologise for the rubbish template that has been used to welcome you; if there are any questions you have about Wikipedia, please do feel free to ask me. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 20:14, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks - I'll collect my thoughts and reply tomorrow. As for templates... it seemed overwhelming and... boring... for a new user compared to others that I've seen on other wikis. I know why they're necessary, but at least Favonian was helpful when I asked him/her for help later. Absconded Northerner (talk) 20:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
RfC on diacritics
I don't care enough to continue the debate. I would appreciate if you would stop patronizing me by typing "!vote" everytime you refer to my opinion on the matter. But then again, maybe I don't have enough edits on enwp to be taken seriously. /Grillo (talk) 21:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- !vote is the standard way on this wiki of describing a "Support" or "Oppose" statement on a debate page. Such discussions are understood to NOT be votes, and "!vote" is a shorthand for this - "!" is the "NOT" operator in C-like languages. See WP:!VOTE. You made a !vote on the RfC page and then said you didn't care. I asked if, in that light, you were now going to remove it. If you don't understand the policies of the English language wiki, perhaps you should stop engaging in such discussions here? Absconded Northerner (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- It would have been nice to be linked to such a page the first time it's written. I didn't know only the inner circle were invited into the discussions... I believe I know where I'm not wanted now though... /Grillo (talk) 02:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- It would have been nice if you had Assumed Good Faith. It would also have been nice if you had looked at my account history before calling me one of "the inner circle".
- I can't believe you have the gall to make posts like this when it's you who has come to a different wiki, not bothered to do any research, and accused people of acting incorrectly. Absconded Northerner (talk) 03:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
WP:BRD and No true Scotsman
Absconded Northerner, can you please revert yourself at No true Scotsman and discuss your desire to add this text on the talk page instead? Please see WP:BRD, which while not a policy is a pretty well respected convention here at Wikipedia. We don't add examples to pages because they seem "perfect" to us, we do so because sources cite them as good examples of something. Currently, the addition violates WP:NOR which is a policy. So please, can you revert yourself and discuss on the talk page instead? Thanks.Griswaldo (talk) 03:58, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- I've just responded on the talk page of that article. Absconded Northerner (talk) 04:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Information
I realise you are new to Wikipedia and are hot on rules. So, you may like to read Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 16:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm aware of it. Since you are unaware of any of the site policies, I decided to ignore it in your case. It's an essay, not policy, so ignoring it in cases where users are disrupting the site is quite allowable. Cease your disruption now. Absconded Northerner (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- If I am disruptive, report me. If you can have my rollback removed, be my guest. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 16:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- If you misuse it again, I will. Oh, and please learn to use talk pages in the meantime. If I post on your page, reply on your page, instead of splitting the conversation over two different locations. You're doing something only new users tend to do. Absconded Northerner (talk) 16:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your help
Thank you for reverting my bots edits (see the thread on my talk page). I will work on tracking down the bug before running the bot again in an unsupervised mode. Thanks again! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:26, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- My pleasure - I happened to be looking at some whisky articles when it was going on. Having written a wiki bot myself (not for here - another wiki), I know the problems. I hope it's an easy problem to fix! Absconded Northerner (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
List of Neighbours characters
Hi, just wanted to say thanks for looking out for the article and making sure I didn't violate 3rr today. :) - JuneGloom Talk 00:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. It's one of those times when 3RR doesn't make sense as a rule, but try explaining that to any of the admins... Absconded Northerner (talk) 04:33, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
KChenoweth.Net
KChenoweth.Net is probably not a RS, but as you say, better than "sod all". Perhaps a more reliable ref can be found. --BweeB (talk) 18:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Absolutely. I included it because there was no sourcing at all and I was on the point of "fixing" the birth name when I came across it. I went down a few pages on Google but couldn't come across anything better (IMDB doesn't count). I'll keep looking though! Absconded Northerner (talk) 21:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 11:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Yoenit (talk) 11:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Yoghurt". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by December 5, 2011.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 21:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- You have to be kidding, right? Absconded Northerner (talk) 07:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
Hi Absconded Northerner. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Swarm X 17:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. That should be very useful. Absconded Northerner (talk) 18:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
"Free as a Bird" proposed lede change
FYI, there is a vote taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 03:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Request for mediation rejected
The request for formal mediation concerning Yoghurt, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 12:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Break?
Man that short break till Nov 20 has turned into 3 months. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll
You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A Dobos torte for you!
.jpg)
|
7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Absconded Northerner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Absconded Northerner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Absconded Northerner. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Absconded Northerner. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mottingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grove Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- Pointless thanks to the bot. I hadn't spotted I'd used the wrong link. Absconded Northerner (talk) 23:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
About that apology....
Good morning!
A few weeks ago you dragged me into a dispute between yourself and another person here on Wikipedia.
I said at the time I wasn't sure why I was being involved, as this is between you two, and asked for an apology.
You still haven't apologized to me for this. You should so please do so now.
Thanks!
The Sheriff. Sheriff of Mottingham (talk) 08:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- It was you. Don't pretend otherwise. You'll get an apology from me when Satan uses ice skates to get to work. Absconded Northerner (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi!
This is pretty disappointing. You mentioned my name, a brand new and eager content creator, as part of some petty dispute, even though I am new to the site with no history.
Are you absolutely sure this is the position you wish to take? You have an opportunity right now to set it right. Do the right thing and apologise.
Sheriff of Mottingham (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- My reply to you is the same as the one given in the case of Arkell v Pressdram. Absconded Northerner (talk) 13:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Oh dear. You really should have apologized. You'll wish you did. Sheriff of Mottingham (talk) 20:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Is that a threat? Absconded Northerner (talk) 06:03, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |