180.150.115.31

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to Gasoline. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (180.150.115.31) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks you are so sweet:) 180.150.115.31 (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Demographics of India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 11:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Demographics of India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Adding poorly sourced material

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:07, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Last warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

GFY, it's not unsourced.180.150.115.31 (talk) 15:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:04, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Same behavior; blocks will keep getting longer

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:50, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

That's fine...I've got a lot of time180.150.115.31 (talk) 04:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Celeste Barber, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• Hi Material scientist. I was looking for a source in the meantime, thanks.180.150.115.31 (talk) 11:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 13:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Same editing as before

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:04, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

180.150.115.31 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'd like to ask for a review. I made some edits to the Abu Dhabi article and others and this editor is falsely calling them disruptive editing. He has reverted edits because he feels like it; this is not on. I must also add, when here reverted the edits, he did not make an attempt to review the edits and leave the okay parts. I'd like different editors to review this block. Not the editor that blocked me, thank you. Also I notice that haven't breached the 3R policy. Thank you. 180.150.115.31 (talk) 14:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you wish to be unblocked, you need to show you understand why your edits are inappropriate and explain how your future edits would be different, if unblocked. Yamla (talk) 18:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've been repeatedly asked to stop make unsourced edits; on top of that, a lot of your edits are clearly inappropriate. This non-sequiter about a Israeli tennis player in a section about judo makes no sense. When you refuse to take feedback from anyone and insist on repeating your edits over and over again, your blocks get longer. Comments like this suggest that you intend to continue the same behavior. Regarding your assertion that I didn't attempt to leave the okay parts; there weren't any okay parts in this edit. A primary source is questionable to establish the church as "the first"; the other date was unsourced, and the taxi photo was poor quality and not useful. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:24, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

February 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Murder of Sarah Everard, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. MIDI (talk) 12:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please also familiarise yourself with the three revert rule and our policy on edit warring. You may be blocked from editing for violating these rules. MIDI (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Airbus A300, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore the morgue) 15:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---