October 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Opacity has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Opacity was changed by 103.29.140.118 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892343 on 2016-10-13T03:52:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Absorption. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2023

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cai Xukun. EditingMatthew (talk) 06:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Full River Red. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 06:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 07:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2023

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cai Xukun. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Specifically, i have noticed specifically the usage of the name "Tiger Tang", and all referenced to the original named have been replaced by it.

Starchamelix (talk) 03:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to River source—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 00:08, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template talk:Taxonomy/Eukaryota/displayed. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 01:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm CanonNi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Danny Meyer have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. CanonNi (talk) 06:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2024

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of Qatar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.