- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Teresa Mañé
Improved to Good Article status by Grnrchst (talk). Self-nominated at 16:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Teresa Mañé; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
Congratulations on the promotion to Good Article! I haven't noticed anything seriously wrong in my own review. It's new enough (recent GA status), it's long enough, it has thorough use of reliable sources, Earwig and my own reading notices no flagrant copyright violations or serious paraphrasing issues, and the hooks are interesting. I am
assuming good faith with the sources written in Catalan and Spanish (which I do not read), but I did sight verify the references to Lee 2009, Ackleberg 2005, and Davies 2000 (with the exception of pages 140–141, which I could not view on my Google Books preview). My only critical comment at this stage is that I think the last sentence of the first paragraph under views ("During the Spanish Revolution of 1936...") could be helped by an additional reference confirming that Mañé's organizing took place during the 1936 Spanish Revolution, which does not seem to quite be stated on pages 44–45 of Ackleberg 2005. However, DYK's standard of quality does not require the article to be perfect, and I trust that you can either point out something I have missed or readily resolve the matter, plus it does not impinge on any of the suggested hooks. I personally would hesitate to use ALT1, since the article itself notes that Teresa Claramunt was also involved in the early development of anarchist feminism, and the beginnings of thought and movements are fuzzy things. All other hooks are great. I'm personally most fond of ALT0 and ALT4.
Hydrangeans (
she/her |
talk |
edits) 21:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations on the promotion to Good Article! I haven't noticed anything seriously wrong in my own review. It's new enough (recent GA status), it's long enough, it has thorough use of reliable sources, Earwig and my own reading notices no flagrant copyright violations or serious paraphrasing issues, and the hooks are interesting. I am 
assuming good faith with the sources written in Catalan and Spanish (which I do not read), but I did sight verify the references to Lee 2009, Ackleberg 2005, and Davies 2000 (with the exception of pages 140–141, which I could not view on my Google Books preview). My only critical comment at this stage is that I think the last sentence of the first paragraph under views ("During the Spanish Revolution of 1936...") could be helped by an additional reference confirming that Mañé's organizing took place during the 1936 Spanish Revolution, which does not seem to quite be stated on pages 44–45 of Ackleberg 2005. However, DYK's standard of quality does not require the article to be perfect, and I trust that you can either point out something I have missed or readily resolve the matter, plus it does not impinge on any of the suggested hooks. I personally would hesitate to use ALT1, since the article itself notes that Teresa Claramunt was also involved in the early development of anarchist feminism, and the beginnings of thought and movements are fuzzy things. All other hooks are great. I'm personally most fond of ALT0 and ALT4. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 21:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)