Talk:Underinsured
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Isn't this the start of a dict. def? I don't see any encyclopedic info here. --Bookandcoffee 15:48, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Actually I'm the one who started this page. The work on 'underinsured' needs to be here. There are multifactorial reasons for underinsurane and yes the article is in progress but like many others .. just has to have time. Please remove the wicktionary and put a stub here. I'll work over the weekend to see if I can't expand this or make headers for expansion suitably. DrGnu 17:49, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
It is indeed a dictionary definition. "Underinsured" means "To insure under a policy that provides inadequate benefits"[1]. It is applicable to all types of insurance. The reasons for having inadequate health insurance should be discussed in health insurance just as the reasons for having inadquate home or auto insurance should be discussed in home insurance or auto insurance. -AED 04:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
2009: Redirected the dicdef/coatrack
editThis was a dictionary definition (see WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary which, after I redirected, someone falsely claimed vandalism (good faith edits are never vandalism by Wikipedia policy) and wrote a WP:COATRACK. Again, following WP:NOT, I have reinstated the redirect as I think it is better for Wikipedia than a deletion discussion. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 23:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC)