Talk:Some Great Reward

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Industrial Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndustrialWikipedia:WikiProject IndustrialTemplate:WikiProject IndustrialIndustrial music articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Industrial To-do:

Top priority articles to improve to Good article status

Front 242
Front Line Assembly
Ministry
Skinny Puppy
Throbbing Gristle – needs "Musical style" and "Critical reception" sections
Wax Trax! Records

High priority articles to improve to B-Class status

Mid priority articles to improve to C-Class status

Peak Position # 54 in the US but year end # 91 ??

Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

strange

how it can be that it reached only # 54 but on year end # 91?

was this in the 80s usually and common ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.137.54 (talk) 18:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

It also states in the opening that the album reached #51 in the US, whereas in the charts table it says it reached #54. Which one is correct? --Geach (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

According to the Depeche Mode discography, the album peaked at number 54 so I've changed it accordingly. --Geach (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

The album peaked at #54 on the Billboard 200. But as it spent so many weeks on that chart, it sold enough to be placed at #91 on the Year end chart — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:1048:78CF:C9AD:9E95 (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Some Great Reward. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140804194725/http://www.infodisc.fr/Album_D.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/Album_D.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic