Talk:Russell Investments
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Proposed additions to Corporate overview
editThis edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello! I'd like to submit a request to add two claims about Russell Investments' industry standings to the Corporate overview section on behalf of the company, and as part of my work at Beutler Ink. I propose adding the following:
- "The firm ranks as the third largest outsourced CIO (OCIO) provider globally", per this source
- "Russell Investments is the largest independent open-architecture investment platform in the asset management industry", per the source. I should note, this source may be paywalled, but I can confirm there's a list of "OCIO Assets" showing Russell Investments with the highest total of $208.04 billion.
I've drafted specific text and citations at User:Inkian Jason/Russell Investments for easier review and copy/paste, and this diff shows proposed changes. I don't believe these claims are particularly controversial and I think Pensions & Investments and CIO magazine are Wikipedia-appropriate publications.
@Chetsford and Matthew hk: I am putting this request on your radar, given your previous edits and assistance here to help clean up the Frank Russell Company article and separate out the Russell Investments page. Are one of you willing to review this request and update the article on my behalf?
Thanks in advance for any feedback. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Inkian Jason: - I have made the changes with the exception of "Russell Investments is the largest independent open-architecture investment platform in the asset management industry" - I think it will be good to have another reference apart from the paywalled link as there's no way to verify the content. Thanks! Westminster88 (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:15, 19 October 2020 (UTC)