Talk:Randy Edsall

Latest comment: 3 months ago by 137.103.85.33 in topic Maryland section bias

Maryland section bias

edit

Marylad fans are angry with Edsall after the poor 2011 season. As such this section is riddled with bias.Lebanonman19 (talk) 23:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

That's because he sucked as a football coach, took credit for wins, and threw his players under the bus ("they didn't do this, didn't do that") when they lost. The Edsall years were a distinct nadir of Maryland football. 137.103.85.33 (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article is hardly a bias-riddled one, unless you are categorizing it as a pro-Edsall vehicle. It neglects to address his terminating of a number of team and fan traditions, and the departure of a number of high-quality, good-character players, that decimated the team, compounded by highly questionable personnel decisions regarding those left behind. The commenter below has a far more accurate take on Edsall's progress -- or lack thereof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.101.1.120 (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

His bio should mention his struggles and failures in coaching along with successes. In doing so it is important to not he was 2-10 at Maryland with never before seen transfers, loss of donors, lack of ticket sales, etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.163.95.80 (talk) 07:43, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply