This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Latest comment: 17 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
It seems as if the article is about two things: the building and the organization it contains. I have some citable sources that talk about the organization changing its name to Proctors and then to Proctors Collaborative, so what I am wondering is--should this article reflect that the organization has changed its official name? And what's the right division of labor, so to speak, between org and facility in the scope of this article? Justinkrivers (talk) 14:51, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
I think the way to proceed is to build out this article more and flesh out the organization history, and then if it needs to be spun off to a different entry we can analyze it at that later time. There's a lot of notability and a lot of sources I am collecting so I can see it going either way. Justinkrivers (talk) 14:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The timeline for expansion section seems really outdated, I was thinking that it might be more accurate to have a couple of different subsections for eras of the facility/organization, and then maybe a section on notable programs? I think improvements can be incorporated into the text of the article in the appropriate sequence instead of having a timeline. Justinkrivers (talk) 21:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
