Talk:Peter Lu
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Deletion proposal
editI also think this should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.220.60 (talk) 14:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Delete! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.243.37 (talk) 00:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC) I say delete, far more prominent academics who should have a page compared to this guy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.243.37 (talk) 22:55, 23 February 2008 (UTC) This article has been nominated for deletion citing lack of notability. Please note the addition of the citation from Science Careers, http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2006_02_17/profile_peter_lu
This may qualify Lu for notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alindsey (talk • contribs) 22:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Peter Lu created this page I believe. I don't feel he is notable enough to have a page either. Some interesting discoveries, yes but I've seen more notable academics deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.196.140 (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC) Lu created this page, I think, whilst promising, he shouldn not be prominent enough for a page as of yet —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.253.212.114 (talk) 03:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
I really think this page should be deleted. It was clearly created by Peter Lu. Everybody has some vague claim to fame; does that mean that everyone should have a wikipedia entry? Delete! 131.111.243.37 (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- That's completely unfounded. The edit history does NOT show that this was created by Lu. See here. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I created this article, and I am not Peter Lu. JRSpriggs (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I also edit this page and am not Lu. If Lu was in charge of this page, it would probably contain more up to date information (newer publications are not listed). The editing history furthermore does not show that Lu has ever edited this page and other users (see above) have identified themselves as the editors/founders (including myself). The page should stay at wikipedia. 18.80.7.73 (talk) 00:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Anyone who want to express his opinion on the question of whether this article should be deleted should do so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Lu (where it matters) rather than just here. JRSpriggs (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)The bad news is that it is too late to make any more comments. The good news is that it was decided to keep this article as indicated by the template at the top of this page. JRSpriggs (talk) 10:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter Lu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081010224651/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/Health__Science/Medieval_Muslims_made_stunning_maths_breakthrough/articleshow/1670199.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/Health__Science/Medieval_Muslims_made_stunning_maths_breakthrough/articleshow/1670199.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)